Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32806024›Full record

ArticleACS nano2020

Nanocube Imprint Lithography.

Harshal Agrawal, Erik C Garnett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS nano, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Harshal AgrawalCenter for Nanophotonics, AMOLF, Science Park 104, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5106-3947
Erik C GarnettCenter for Nanophotonics, AMOLF, Science Park 104, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9158-8326

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, imprint lithography has emerged as a promising patterning technique capable of high-speed and volume production. In this work, we report highly reproducible one-step printing of metal nanocubes. A dried film of monocrystalline silver cubes serves as the resist, and a soft polydimethylsiloxane stamp directly imprints the final pattern. The use of atomically smooth and sharp faceted nanocubes facilitates the printing of high-resolution and well-defined patterns with face-to-face alignment between adjacent cubes. It also permits digital control over the line width of patterns such as straight lines, curves, and complex junctions over an area of several square millimeters. Single-particle lattices as well as three-dimensional nanopatterns are also demonstrated with an aspect ratio up to 5 in the vertical direction. The high-fidelity nanocube patterning combined with the previously demonstrated epitaxial overgrowth can enable curved (single) crystals from solution at room temperature or highly efficient transparent conductors.

Indexed as

assemblycolloidal inklarge-scale printingnanocubespatterningPDMS

Identifiers

PMID32806024
PMCPMC7513471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.