Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32805548›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2020

Evaluating the resource allocation index as a potential fMRI-based biomarker for substance use disorder.

Mahdi Moradi, Hamed Ekhtiari, Rayus Kuplicki, Brett McKinney, Jennifer L Stewart, Teresa A Victor, Martin P Paulus, Tulsa 1000 Investigators

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mahdi MoradiLaureate Institute for Brain Research, 6655 South Yale Ave., Tulsa, OK, 74136, United States; Department of Computer Science, J. Newton Rayzor Hall, The University of Tulsa, 800 South Tucker Drive, Tulsa, OK, 74104, United States. Electronic address: mmoradi@laureateinstitute.org.
Hamed EkhtiariLaureate Institute for Brain Research, 6655 South Yale Ave., Tulsa, OK, 74136, United States. Electronic address: hekhtiari@laureateinstitute.org.
Rayus KuplickiLaureate Institute for Brain Research, 6655 South Yale Ave., Tulsa, OK, 74136, United States. Electronic address: rkuplicki@laureateinstitute.org.
Brett McKinneyDepartment of Computer Science, J. Newton Rayzor Hall, The University of Tulsa, 800 South Tucker Drive, Tulsa, OK, 74104, United States; Department of Mathematics, Keplinger Hall 3085, The University of Tulsa, 800 South Tucker Drive, Tulsa, OK, 74104, United States. Electronic address: brett-mckinney@utulsa.edu.
Jennifer L StewartLaureate Institute for Brain Research, 6655 South Yale Ave., Tulsa, OK, 74136, United States; Department of Community Medicine, Oxley Health Sciences, The University of Tulsa, 1215 S. Boulder Ave, Tulsa, OK, 74119, United States. Electronic address: jstewart@laureateinstitute.org.
Teresa A VictorLaureate Institute for Brain Research, 6655 South Yale Ave., Tulsa, OK, 74136, United States. Electronic address: tvictor@laureateinstitute.org.
Martin P PaulusLaureate Institute for Brain Research, 6655 South Yale Ave., Tulsa, OK, 74136, United States; Department of Community Medicine, Oxley Health Sciences, The University of Tulsa, 1215 S. Boulder Ave, Tulsa, OK, 74119, United States; Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, United States. Electronic address: mpaulus@laureateinstitute.org.
Tulsa 1000 Investigators

Funding

The Center for Neuroscience-based Mental Health Assessment and Prediction (NEUROMAP)P20GM121312 · NIGMS · LAUREATE INSTITUTE FOR BRAIN RESEARCH · PI Maëlle Camille Marie Gueguen · 2017 to 2026
$23.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM121312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a lack of neuroscience-based biomarkers for the diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of individuals with substance use disorders (SUD). The resource allocation index (RAI), a measure of the interrelationship between salience, executive control and default-mode brain networks (SN, ECN, and DMN), has been proposed as one such biomarker. However, the RAI has yet to be extensively tested in SUD samples.

methodsThe present analysis compared RAI scores between individuals with stimulant and/or opioid use disorders (SUD; n = 139, abstinent 4-365 days) and healthy controls (HC; n = 56) who had completed resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans within the context of the Tulsa 1000 cohort. First, we used independent component analysis (ICA) to identify the SN, ECN, and DMN and extract their time series data. Second, we used multiple permutations of automatically identified networks to compute RAI as reported in the fMRI literature.

resultsFirst, the RAI as a metric depended substantially on the approach that was used to define the network components. Second, regardless of the selection of networks, after controlling for multiple testing there was no difference in RAI scores between SUD and HC. Third, the RAI was not associated with any substance use-related self-report measures.

conclusionTaken together, these findings do not provide evidence that RAI can be used as an fMRI-derived biomarker for the severity or diagnosis of individuals with SUD.

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkersBrainBrain MappingExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetResource AllocationSubstance-Related DisordersBiomarkersBiomarkerDefault mode networkExecutive control networkIndependent component analysisResource allocation indexResting-state fMRISalience networkSubstance use disorder

Identifiers

PMID32805548
PMCPMC7609625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.