Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32805027›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology2020

Peroxisome retention involves Inp1-dependent peroxisome-plasma membrane contact sites in yeast.

Arjen M Krikken, Huala Wu, Rinse de Boer, Damien P Devos, Tim P Levine, Ida J van der Klei

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Correlative Light- and Electron Microscopy in Peroxisome Research.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Peroxisomal Membrane Contact Sites in Yeasts.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Arjen M KrikkenMolecular Cell Biology, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Huala WuMolecular Cell Biology, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Rinse de BoerMolecular Cell Biology, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Damien P DevosCentro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Pablo de Olavide University, Seville, Spain.
Tim P LevineInstitute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK.
Ida J van der KleiMolecular Cell Biology, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
University of Groningen · NLConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M011801/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P003818/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retention of peroxisomes in yeast mother cells requires Inp1, which is recruited to the organelle by the peroxisomal membrane protein Pex3. Here we show that Hansenula polymorpha Inp1 associates peroxisomes to the plasma membrane. Peroxisome-plasma membrane contact sites disappear upon deletion of INP1 but increase upon INP1 overexpression. Analysis of truncated Inp1 variants showed that the C terminus is important for association to the peroxisome, while a stretch of conserved positive charges and a central pleckstrin homology-like domain are important for plasma membrane binding. In cells of a PEX3 deletion, strain Inp1-GFP localizes to the plasma membrane, concentrated in patches near the bud neck and in the cortex of nascent buds. Upon disruption of the actin cytoskeleton by treatment of the cells with latrunculin A, Inp1-GFP became cytosolic, indicating that Inp1 localization is dependent on the presence of an intact actin cytoskeleton.

Indexed as

Actin CytoskeletonBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicCell MembraneEndoplasmic ReticulumGene Expression Regulation, FungalMembrane ProteinsMitochondrial MembranesPeroxinsPeroxisomesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSaccharomycetalesThiazolidinesBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicINP1 protein, S cerevisiaelatrunculin AMembrane ProteinsPeroxinsPEX3 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsThiazolidines

Identifiers

PMID32805027
PMCPMC7659721
OpenAlexW3063825299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.