Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32804946›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2020

Extent and context dependence of pleiotropy revealed by high-throughput single-cell phenotyping.

Kerry A Geiler-Samerotte, Shuang Li, Charalampos Lazaris, Austin Taylor, Naomi Ziv, Chelsea Ramjeawan, Annalise B Paaby, Mark L Siegal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Patterns and evolutionary consequences of pleiotropy.Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Pleiotropy data resource as a primer for investigating co-morbidities/multi-morbidities and their role in disease.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kerry A Geiler-SamerotteCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4666-2192
Shuang LiCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4658-9765
Charalampos LazarisCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7345-8288
Austin TaylorCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Naomi ZivCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1299-5335
Chelsea RamjeawanCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Annalise B PaabySchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1422-047X
Mark L SiegalCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6930-2988

Funding

A quantitative examination of cellular mechanisms that modulate the impacts of genetic variation - Renewal - 1R35GM133674 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI Kerry A Geiler-Samerotte · 2019 to 2026
$2.8M
Genetic Architecture and Developmental Consequences of Conditionally Functional MutationsR35GM119744 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI PAABY, ANNALISE BLOSS · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
Genetic and Nongenetic Variation in Complex TraitsR35GM118170 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI SIEGAL, MARK L · 2016 to 2021
$1.7M
Reducing genetic buffering to identify QTLs that affect cell shape and growthF32GM103166 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI GEILER-SAMEROTTE, KERRY A · 2012 to 2013
$101k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM103166NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118170NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM119744NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM133674
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pleiotropy-when a single mutation affects multiple traits-is a controversial topic with far-reaching implications. Pleiotropy plays a central role in debates about how complex traits evolve and whether biological systems are modular or are organized such that every gene has the potential to affect many traits. Pleiotropy is also critical to initiatives in evolutionary medicine that seek to trap infectious microbes or tumors by selecting for mutations that encourage growth in some conditions at the expense of others. Research in these fields, and others, would benefit from understanding the extent to which pleiotropy reflects inherent relationships among phenotypes that correlate no matter the perturbation (vertical pleiotropy). Alternatively, pleiotropy may result from genetic changes that impose correlations between otherwise independent traits (horizontal pleiotropy). We distinguish these possibilities by using clonal populations of yeast cells to quantify the inherent relationships between single-cell morphological features. Then, we demonstrate how often these relationships underlie vertical pleiotropy and how often these relationships are modified by genetic variants (quantitative trait loci [QTL]) acting via horizontal pleiotropy. Our comprehensive screen measures thousands of pairwise trait correlations across hundreds of thousands of yeast cells and reveals ample evidence of both vertical and horizontal pleiotropy. Additionally, we observe that the correlations between traits can change with the environment, genetic background, and cell-cycle position. These changing dependencies suggest a nuanced view of pleiotropy: biological systems demonstrate limited pleiotropy in any given context, but across contexts (e.g., across diverse environments and genetic backgrounds) each genetic change has the potential to influence a larger number of traits. Our method suggests that exploiting pleiotropy for applications in evolutionary medicine would benefit from focusing on traits with correlations that are less dependent on context.

Indexed as

Genetic PleiotropyModels, GeneticMultifactorial InheritanceQuantitative Trait LociBiological EvolutionCell CycleClone CellsGenetic VariationHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysMutationPhenotypeSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSingle-Cell AnalysisSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID32804946
PMCPMC7451985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.