Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32804917›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of case reports2020

Potential Role of Oxygen-Ozone Therapy in Treatment of COVID-19 Pneumonia.

Alberto Hernández, Montserrat Viñals, Tomas Isidoro, Francisco Vilás

Open access · hybridAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Ozone application in different industries: A review of recent developments.Chemical engineering journal (Lausanne, Switzerland : 1996) · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Promising gas therapies for severe COVID-19.Journal of intensive medicine · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alberto HernándezDepartment of Anesthesiology, Policlinica Ibiza Hospital, Ibiza, Spain.
Montserrat ViñalsDepartment of Internal Medicine, Policlinica Ibiza Hospital, Ibiza, Spain.
Tomas IsidoroDepartment of Surgery, Policlinica Ibiza Hospital, Ibiza, Spain.
Francisco VilásDepartment of Surgery, Policlinica Ibiza Hospital, Ibiza, Spain.
Clínica Subiza · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Pneumonia caused by coronavirus originated in Wuhan, China in late 2019 and has spread around the world, becoming a pandemic. Many patients deteriorate rapidly and require intubation and mechanical ventilation, which is causing the collapse of healthcare systems in many countries. Coronavirus infection is associated with extensive lung inflammation and microvascular thrombosis, which can result in hypoxia. It can also cause severe and lasting harm in other organs, including the heart and kidneys. At present, there is no proven and efficacious treatment for this new disease. Consequently, there is a growing tendency to use novel methods. Ozone therapy consists of administration of a mixture of oxygen and ozone (a molecule consisting of 3 oxygen atoms). The potential benefits of this therapy include reduced tissue hypoxia, decreased hypercoagulability, renal and heart protection, modulated immune function, improved phagocytic function, and impaired viral replication. CASE REPORT We report rapidly improved hypoxia with associated decreases in inflammatory markers and D-dimer immediately after 1-4 sessions of oxygen-ozone (O₂-O₃) therapy in 3 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia who presented with respiratory failure. Invasive mechanical ventilation was not required in these 3 patients. All patients were discharged home on days 3-4 after O₂-O₃ therapy. CONCLUSIONS O₂-O₃ therapy appears to be an effective therapy for COVID-19 patients with severe respiratory failure. Large controlled clinical trials are required to study the efficacy and safety of using O₂-O₃ therapy compared with the standard supportive case in patients with COVID-19 in terms of the need for invasive ventilation and length of hospital and intensive care unit stays.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusBlood Transfusion, AutologousCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19C-Reactive ProteinFemaleFerritinsFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation ProductsHumansHypoxiaInfusions, IntravenousL-Lactate DehydrogenaseLungMaleMiddle AgedOxygenC-Reactive ProteinFerritinsFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Productsfibrin fragment DL-Lactate DehydrogenaseOxygenOzone

Identifiers

PMID32804917
PMCPMC7476746
OpenAlexW3049123420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.