Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32804742›Full record

Trial reportInternational clinical psychopharmacology2020

Effect of pimavanserin on anxious depression in patients with major depression and an inadequate response to previous therapy: secondary analysis of the clarity study.

George I Papakostas, Maurizio Fava, Marlene P Freeman, Richard C Shelton, Michael E Thase, Manish K Jha, Madhukar H Trivedi, Bryan Dirks, Keith Liu, Srdjan Stankovic

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International clinical psychopharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Complex Impact of Systemically Administered 5-HT2A Receptor Ligands on Conditioned Fear.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

George I PapakostasDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Maurizio FavaDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Marlene P FreemanDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Richard C SheltonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Michael E ThaseDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, the University of Pennsylvania and the Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Manish K JhaIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Madhukar H TrivediThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Bryan DirksACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
Keith LiuACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
Srdjan StankovicACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
Acadia Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a post hoc analysis, the effect of pimavanserin on anxious depression was determined from CLARITY, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with major depression and an inadequate response to previous therapy. Patients were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to placebo or pimavanserin 34 mg daily added to ongoing antidepressant therapy. At 5 weeks, placebo nonresponders were rerandomized to placebo or pimavanserin for an additional 5 weeks. Mean change from baseline to week 5 for the Hamilton depression rating scale (HAMD) anxiety/somatization (AS) factor was examined for all patients and those with a score ≥7 at baseline. Least squares (LS) mean [standard error (SE)] difference between placebo and pimavanserin for the AS factor score was -1.5 (0.41) [95% confidence interval (CI) -2.4 to -0.7; P = 0.0003; effect size: 0.634]. Among patients with an AS factor score ≥7 at baseline, LS mean (SE) difference was -2.2 (0.66) (95% CI -3.5 to -0.9; P = 0.0013; effect size: 0.781). Response rates (≥50% reduction in HAMD-17 from baseline) were 22.4 and 55.2% (P = 0.0012) and remission rates (HAMD-17 total score <7) were 5.3 and 24.1% (P = 0.0047), respectively, with placebo and pimavanserin among patients with a baseline AS factor score ≥7. Among patients with anxious major depressive disorder at baseline, adjunctive pimavanserin was associated with a significant improvement.

Indexed as

AdultAntidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsAnxietyDepressionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedPiperidinesUreaAntidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic AgentspimavanserinPiperidinesUrea

Identifiers

PMID32804742
PMCPMC7531498
OpenAlexW3073549286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.