ArticleAmerican journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation2021
Chronic Poststroke Deficits in Gross and Fine Motor Control of the Ipsilesional Upper Limb.
Article in American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Behavioral and neurophysiological changes associated with a single session of bimanual task practice after stroke.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2026Article
- Cortical activity in patients with high-functioning ischemic stroke during the Purdue Pegboard Test: insights into bimanual coordinated fine motor skills with functional near-infrared spectroscopy.Neural regeneration research · 2024Article
- Upper extremity asymmetry due to nerve injuries or central neurologic conditions: a scoping review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Bimanual coordination during reach-to-grasp actions is sensitive to task goal with distinctions between left- and right-hemispheric stroke.Experimental brain research · 2022Article
- Object-centered sensorimotor bias of torque control in the chronic stage following stroke.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Development and Psychometric Testing of the Bimanual Assessment Measure for People With Chronic Stroke.The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association · 2022Article
- Microstructure and Genetic Polymorphisms: Role in Motor Rehabilitation After Subcortical Stroke.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Review
- Dynamic Relationship Between Interhemispheric Functional Connectivity and Corticospinal Tract Changing Pattern After Subcortical Stroke.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
- Enhancing motor learning in people with stroke via memory reactivation during sleep.Rehabilitation psychology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesIndividuals with stroke often experience contralesional and ipsilesional arm motor deficits. The aim of this study was to compare fine and gross motor hand dexterity of the ipsilesional hand post-stroke with controls, normative values, and the contralesional hand.
designData were collected from right-handed individuals with chronic stroke (n = 20), age-/sex-matched controls (n = 10), and normative values (n = 20) performing the Nine-Hole Peg Test and the Box and Blocks Test.
resultsIndividuals with stroke demonstrated poorer performance with the ipsilesional arm relative to both the control group (mean difference [95% confidence interval]: Nine-Hole Peg Test [seconds], 3.4 [-0.5 to 7.3]; Box and Blocks Test [number of blocks], -12.3 [-20.3 to -4.2]) and normative values (mean difference [95% confidence interval]: Nine-Hole Peg Test [seconds], 6.5 [4.0-9.1]; Box and Blocks Test (number of blocks), -15.3 [-20.1 to -10.5]). Ipsilesional arm performance was significantly better than performance with the contralesional arm (mean difference [95% confidence interval]: Nine-Hole Peg Test [seconds], -9.4 [-20.2 to 1.4]; Box and Blocks Test (number of blocks), 33.2 [20.9-45.5]).
conclusionThese findings identify residual deficits in fine and gross dexterity of the ipsilesional hand in commonly used outcome measures of hand manipulation among individuals with chronic stroke. Possible underlying mechanisms and clinical relevance are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.