Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32804707›Full record

ArticleMelanoma research2020

Preliminary analysis of distinct clinical and biologic features of bone metastases in melanoma.

Melissa A Wilson, Judy Zhong, Paul Johannet, Yesung Lee, Natasha Masub, Todd Wechter, Una Moran, Russell S Berman, Richard L Shapiro, Jeffrey Weber and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Melanoma research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Survival outcomes in patients withFrontiers in oncology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Extracellular Vesicles in Tumors: A Potential Mediator of Bone Metastasis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa A WilsonDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perlmutter Cancer Center.
Judy ZhongDepartment of Population Health.
Paul JohannetDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perlmutter Cancer Center.
Yesung LeeInterdisciplinary Melanoma Cooperative Group.
Natasha MasubInterdisciplinary Melanoma Cooperative Group.
Todd WechterInterdisciplinary Melanoma Cooperative Group.
Una MoranInterdisciplinary Melanoma Cooperative Group.
Russell S BermanInterdisciplinary Melanoma Cooperative Group.
Richard L ShapiroInterdisciplinary Melanoma Cooperative Group.
Jeffrey WeberDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perlmutter Cancer Center.
Anna PavlickDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perlmutter Cancer Center.
Iman OsmanInterdisciplinary Melanoma Cooperative Group.
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group · USNYU Langone’s Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer CenterNew York University · US

Funding

Vaccine FacilityP30CA016087 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ANIRBAN MAITRA · 1985 to 2026
$83.1M
Project 4P50CA225450 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI KIRCHHOFF, TOMAS · 2019 to 2025
$12.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016087NCI NIH HHS P50 CA225450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melanoma disseminates to the skeletal system where it is then difficult to treat. Yet, there remains limited research investigating metastatic bone disease (MBD) in melanoma. Here, we evaluate whether there are distinct clinicopathologic variables at the time of primary melanoma diagnosis that predispose metastases to engraft bone, and we test the hypothesis that patients with MBD have different responses to treatment. Cutaneous melanoma patients enrolled in a prospective database were studied. Individuals with metastatic melanoma and bone metastases (M-Bone) were compared to those with metastatic disease but no M-Bone. Of the 463 (42.7%) patients, 198 with unresectable metastatic melanoma had M-Bone and 98 developed bone metastasis (bone mets) as first site. Progression-free survival and overall survival were significantly worse in patients with M-Bone compared to those without M-Bone (P < 0.001) independent of treatment modalities, and in patients whose melanoma spread to bone first, compared to those who developed first mets elsewhere (P < 0.001). Interestingly, patients with bone mets presented with primary tumors that had more tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (P < 0.001) and less often a nodular histologic subtype compared to patients without M-Bone (P < 0.001). Our data suggest that melanoma bone metastasis is a distinct clinical and biological entity that cannot be explained by generalized metastatic phenotype in all patients. The observed dichotomy between more favorable primary histopathologic characteristics and a grave overall prognosis requires more studies to elucidate the molecular processes by which melanomas infiltrate bone and to build a mechanistic understanding of how melanoma bone metastases yield such detrimental outcomes.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBone NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalSkin Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID32804707
PMCPMC7484164
OpenAlexW3056210744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.