Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32804298›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomolecular NMR2020

NMR in integrated biophysical drug discovery for RAS: past, present, and future.

Christopher B Marshall, Fenneke KleinJan, Teklab Gebregiworgis, Ki-Young Lee, Zhenhao Fang, Ben J Eves, Ningdi F Liu, Geneviève M C Gasmi-Seabrook, Masahiro Enomoto, Mitsuhiko Ikura

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Hitting the hotspots.Nature chemical biology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. NMR in pharmaceutical discovery and development.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher B MarshallPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada. Chris.Marshall@uhnresearch.ca.
Fenneke KleinJanPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada.
Teklab GebregiworgisPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada.
Ki-Young LeePrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada.
Zhenhao FangPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada.
Ben J EvesPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada.
Ningdi F LiuPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada.
Geneviève M C Gasmi-SeabrookPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada.
Masahiro EnomotoPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada.
Mitsuhiko IkuraPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada. Mitsu.Ikura@uhnresearch.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9524-1303
University Health Network · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute 703209Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute 706696CIHR 410008598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutations in RAS oncogenes occur in ~ 30% of human cancers, with KRAS being the most frequently altered isoform. RAS proteins comprise a conserved GTPase domain and a C-terminal lipid-modified tail that is unique to each isoform. The GTPase domain is a 'switch' that regulates multiple signaling cascades that drive cell growth and proliferation when activated by binding GTP, and the signal is terminated by GTP hydrolysis. Oncogenic RAS mutations disrupt the GTPase cycle, leading to accumulation of the activated GTP-bound state and promoting proliferation. RAS is a key target in oncology, however it lacks classic druggable pockets and has been extremely challenging to target. RAS signaling has thus been targeted indirectly, by harnessing key downstream effectors as well as upstream regulators, or disrupting the proper membrane localization required for signaling, by inhibiting either lipid modification or 'carrier' proteins. As a small (20 kDa) protein with multiple conformers in dynamic equilibrium, RAS is an excellent candidate for NMR-driven characterization and screening for direct inhibitors. Several molecules have been discovered that bind RAS and stabilize shallow pockets through conformational selection, and recent compounds have achieved substantial improvements in affinity. NMR-derived insight into targeting the RAS-membrane interface has revealed a new strategy to enhance the potency of small molecules, while another approach has been development of peptidyl inhibitors that bind through large interfaces rather than deep pockets. Remarkable progress has been made with mutation-specific covalent inhibitors that target the thiol of a G12C mutant, and these are now in clinical trials. Here we review the history of RAS inhibitor development and highlight the utility of NMR and integrated biophysical approaches in RAS drug discovery.

Indexed as

Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 6Drug DiscoveryGuanine Nucleotide Exchange FactorsHumansMembrane ProteinsMutationNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularPrenylationProtein BindingProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Signal TransductionSmall Molecule LibrariesCyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 6Guanine Nucleotide Exchange FactorsKRAS protein, humanMembrane ProteinsPDE6D protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Small Molecule LibrariesConformational selectionDrug discoveryKRASMembrane-associated proteinNMROncogenePrenylation

Identifiers

PMID32804298
OpenAlexW3064112269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.