ArticleEJNMMI research2020
Yttrium-90 radioembolization as a possible new treatment for brain cancer: proof of concept and safety analysis in a canine model.
Article in EJNMMI research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comprehensive review on the current applications and future perspectives of radioembolization in endovascular neurosurgery.Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2026Review
- Radiation in Veterinary Practice: Paradigm Shift Toward Precision and Curative Approaches.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
- Intra-Arterial Super-Selective Delivery of Yttrium-90 for the Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma: In Silico Proof of Concept with Feasibility and Safety Analysis.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Expanding the Scope of Interventional Oncology: Locoregional Therapies in Extrahepatic Malignancies.Cancers · 2025Review
- Clinical Theranostics in Recurrent Gliomas: A Review.Cancers · 2024Review
- Review
- New frontiers in radioembolization.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2024Review
- EANM position paper: theranostics in brain tumours-the present and the future.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Article
- Transarterial Radioembolization: Overview of Radioembolic Devices.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2023Review
- PVA-Microbubbles as a Radioembolization Platform: Formulation and the In Vitro Proof of Concept.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- SIRT in 2025.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2022Review
- Extrahepatic Applications of Yttrium-90 Radioembolization.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2021Review
- Correction to: Yttrium-90 radioembolization as a possible new treatment for brain cancer: proof of concept and safety analysis in a canine model.EJNMMI research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the safety, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of yttrium-90 ( MATERIALS: Three healthy research dogs (R1-R3) and five patient dogs with spontaneous intra-axial brain masses (P1-P5) underwent cerebral artery RE with
resultsThe average absorbed dose to treated tissue in R1-R3 was 14.0, 30.9, and 73.2 Gy, respectively, with maximum doses exceeding 1000 Gy. One month after treatment, research dog pathologic analysis revealed no evidence of cortical atrophy and rare foci consistent with chronic infarcts, e.g., < 2-mm diameter. Absorbed doses to masses in P1-P5 were 45.5, 57.6, 58.1, 45.4, and 64.1 Gy while the dose to uninvolved brain tissue was 15.4, 27.6, 19.2, 16.7, and 33.3 G, respectively. Among both research and patient animals, 6 developed acute neurologic deficits following treatment. However, in all surviving dogs, the deficits were transient resolving between 7 and 33 days post-therapy. At 1 month post-therapy, patient animals showed a 24-94% reduction in mass volume with partial response in P1, P3, and P4 at 6 months post-treatment. While P2 initially showed a response, by 5 months, the mass had advanced beyond pre-treatment size, and the dog was euthanized.
conclusionThis proof of concept demonstrates the technical feasibility and safety of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.