Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32804250›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2021

Arthroscopic classification of intra-articular hip pathology demonstrates at best moderate interrater reliability.

Brendan R Emmons, John J Christoforetti, Dean K Matsuda, Andrew B Wolff, John P Salvo, RobRoy Martin, Dominic S Carreira

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Brendan R EmmonsPeachtree Orthopedics, Atlanta, GA, USA. brendanemmons2@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3563-6124
John J ChristoforettiTexas Health Sports Medicine, Allen, TX, USA.
Dean K MatsudaDISC Sports and Spine Center, Marina Del Rey, CA, USA.
Andrew B WolffHip Preservation and Sports Medicine, Washington Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
John P SalvoRothman Institute, Hip Arthroscopy Program, The Sydney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
RobRoy MartinDepartment of Physical Therapy, Rangos School of Health Sciences, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Dominic S CarreiraPeachtree Orthopedics, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Peachtree Orthopaedic Clinic · USAmerican Sports Medicine Institute · USDuquesne University · USInstitute for Sports Medicine · DEMarina Del Rey Hospital · USThomas Jefferson University Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to report several novel classification systems for intra-articular lesions observed during hip arthroscopy, and to quantify the interrater reliability of both these novel systems and existing classifications of intra-articular lesions when tested by a group of high-volume hip arthroscopists.

methodsFive hip arthroscopists deliberated over shortcomings in current classification systems and developed several novel grading systems with particular effort made to capture factors important to the treatment and outcomes of hip arthroscopy for labral injury. A video learning module describing the classifications was then developed from the video archive of surgeries performed by the senior author and reviewed by study participants. Following review of the module, a pilot study was completed using five randomly selected videos, after which participating surgeons met once more to discuss points of disagreement and to seek clarification. The final video collection for testing reliability was composed of 29 videos selected with the intent of capturing all sublevels of each classification scheme. Study participants recorded their assessments using each classification scheme, and interrater reliability was calculated by a study participant not involved in grading.

resultsThe average kappa coefficients for the classification schemes ranged from 0.38 to 0.54, with the interrater reliability of all classification schemes except labral degeneration qualifying as moderate. The percent of cases with absolute agreement ranged from 17.2% to 51.7% across the classification systems.

conclusionsEven among a group of high-volume hip arthroscopists who engaged in several discussions about the proposed classification schemes, grades were found to have at best moderate interrater reliability. Moderate interrater reliability is demonstrated for novel grading systems for describing labral tear complexity, labral bruising, labral size, and extent of synovitis, and fair reliability is demonstrated for labral degeneration. Further development and refinement of multifactorial grading systems for describing labral injury are indicated. Evaluating the multifactorial nature of intra-articular lesions in the hip is an important part of intraoperative decision-making and defining reliable classifications for intra-articular lesions is a critical first step towards developing generalizable criteria for guiding treatment type. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Indexed as

AdultArthroscopyCartilage, ArticularCartilage DiseasesClinical Decision-MakingFemaleHipHumansMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicPilot ProjectsReproducibility of ResultsRuptureSurgeonsVideo RecordingArticular cartilageHip arthroscopyIntra-articular lesionLabral tearPercent agreementReliability

Identifiers

PMID32804250
OpenAlexW3058626425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.