Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32804154›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical investigation2020

The state of latency in microbial pathogenesis.

Liise-Anne Pirofski, Arturo Casadevall

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Getting on your last nerve: IFNs and resistance to infection.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evolution of the ocular immune system.Eye (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. State of the Field: Cytotoxic Immune Cell Responses inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  10. Melioidosis and Activation from Latency: The "Time Bomb" Has Not Occurred.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Importance of Clinical Isolates inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Facial Erythema Due to Lupus Vulgaris andClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Liise-Anne PirofskiDivision of Infectious Diseases, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA.
Arturo CasadevallDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Funding

Synergy of Host Defense Mechanisms in the LungR01HL059842 · NHLBI · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI CASADEVALL, ARTURO · 1997 to 2023
$7.4M
Antibody therapy for pneumococcal diseaseR01AI123654 · NIAID · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI PIROFSKI, LIISE-ANNE · 2017 to 2021
$2.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL059842NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI123654
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The state of latency occurs when a microbe's persistence in a host produces host damage without perturbing homeostasis sufficiently to cause clinical symptoms or disease. The mechanisms contributing to latency are diverse and depend on the nature of both the microbe and the host. Latency has advantages for both host and microbe. The host avoids progressive damage caused by interaction with the microbe that may translate into disease, and the microbe secures a stable niche in which to survive. Latency is clinically important because some latent microbes can be transmitted to other hosts, and it is associated with a risk for recrudescent microbial growth and development of disease. In addition, it can predispose the host to other diseases, such as malignancies. Hence, latency is a temporally unstable state with an eventual outcome that mainly depends on host immunity. Latency is an integral part of the pathogenic strategies of microbes that require human (and/or mammalian) hosts, including herpesviruses, retroviruses, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and Toxoplasma gondii. However, latency is also an outcome of infection with environmental organisms such as Cryptococcus neoformans, which require no host in their replicative cycles. For most microbes that achieve latency, there is a need for a better understanding and more investigation of host and microbial mechanisms that result in this state.

Indexed as

AnimalsCryptococcosisCryptococcus neoformansHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansMycobacterium tuberculosisToxoplasmaToxoplasmosisTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID32804154
PMCPMC7456213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.