ArticleJMIR cancer2020
Incorporating Breast Cancer Recurrence Events Into Population-Based Cancer Registries Using Medical Claims: Cohort Study.
Article in JMIR cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated Extraction of Postoperative Cancer Recurrence and Metastasis From Computed Tomography (CT) Reports: Semisupervised Deep Learning Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Fully Automated Abstraction of Longitudinal Breast Oncology Records with Off-The-Shelf Large Language Models.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Automated Identification of Breast Cancer Relapse in Computed Tomography Reports Using Natural Language Processing.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2024Article
- Racial Disparities in the Ascertainment of Cancer Recurrence in Electronic Health Records.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2023Article
- Identifying breast cancer recurrence histories via patient-reported outcomes.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2022Article
- New method for determining breast cancer recurrence-free survival using routinely collected real-world health data.BMC cancer · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is a need for automated approaches to incorporate information on cancer recurrence events into population-based cancer registries.
objectiveThe aim of this study is to determine the accuracy of a novel data mining algorithm to extract information from linked registry and medical claims data on the occurrence and timing of second breast cancer events (SBCE).
methodsWe used supervised data from 3092 stage I and II breast cancer cases (with 394 recurrences), diagnosed between 1993 and 2006 inclusive, of patients at Kaiser Permanente Washington and cases in the Puget Sound Cancer Surveillance System. Our goal was to classify each month after primary treatment as pre- versus post-SBCE. The prediction feature set for a given month consisted of registry variables on disease and patient characteristics related to the primary breast cancer event, as well as features based on monthly counts of diagnosis and procedure codes for the current, prior, and future months. A month was classified as post-SBCE if the predicted probability exceeded a probability threshold (PT); the predicted time of the SBCE was taken to be the month of maximum increase in the predicted probability between adjacent months.
resultsThe Kaplan-Meier net probability of SBCE was 0.25 at 14 years. The month-level receiver operating characteristic curve on test data (20% of the data set) had an area under the curve of 0.986. The person-level predictions (at a monthly PT of 0.5) had a sensitivity of 0.89, a specificity of 0.98, a positive predictive value of 0.85, and a negative predictive value of 0.98. The corresponding median difference between the observed and predicted months of recurrence was 0 and the mean difference was 0.04 months.
conclusionsData mining of medical claims holds promise for the streamlining of cancer registry operations to feasibly collect information about second breast cancer events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.