ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2020
After the Randomized Trial: Implementation of Community-Based Continence Promotion in the Real World.
Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preventing Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Scoping Review of Public Health Programs.International urogynecology journal · 2026Review
- Raising Awareness of Pelvic Floor Disorders Among Cultural Health Brokers to Improve Refugee and Immigrant Women's Pelvic Floor Health.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesMost women aged 65 and older have incontinence, associated with high healthcare costs, institutionalization, and negative quality of life, but few seek care. Mind over Matter: Healthy Bowels, Healthy Bladder (MOM) is a small-group self-management workshop, led by a trained facilitator in a community setting, proven to improve incontinence in older women.
designWe used mixed methods to gather information on the real-world adoption, maintenance, and implementation of MOM by community agencies following a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that tested intervention effects on incontinence.
settingCommunity agencies serving older adults in six Wisconsin communities.
participantsCommunity agency administrators and facilitators trained to offer MOM for the RCT. MEASUREMENTS: Investigators tracked rates of adoption (offering MOM in the 12 months following the RCT) and maintenance (offering MOM more than once in the next 18 months) in six communities. Individual interviews and focus groups (N = 17) generated qualitative data about barriers and facilitators related to adoption and maintenance. Trained observers assessed implementation fidelity (alignment with program protocol) at 42 MOM sessions.
resultsA total of 67% of communities (four of six) adopted MOM, and 50% (three of six) maintained MOM. No implementation fidelity lapses occurred. Facilitators of adoption and maintenance included MOM's well-organized protocol and lean time commitment, sharing of implementation efforts between partner organizations, staff specifically assigned to health promotion activities, and high community interest in continence promotion. Other than stigma associated with incontinence, barriers were similar to those seen with other community-based programs for older adults: limited funding/staffing, competing organizational priorities, challenges identifying/training facilitators, and difficulty engaging community partners/participants.
conclusionUsing design for dissemination and community engagement, assessment of implementation outcomes is feasible in conjunction with a clinical RCT. Partner-centered implementation packages can address barriers to adoption and maintenance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.