Trial reportInvestigational new drugs2021
Erlotinib and bevacizumab in elderly patients ≥75 years old with non-small cell lung cancer harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations.
Trial report in Investigational new drugs, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Monotherapy as a First-Line Treatment in Elderly Patients (≥75 Years Old) With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The efficacy and safety of combination therapy with erlotinib and bevacizumab in elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations are unknown. Elderly patients aged ≥75 years old with advanced or recurrent NSCLC and EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation in exon 21) received erlotinib (150 mg, daily) and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg on day 1 of a 21-day cycle) until disease progression or the occurrence of unacceptable toxicities. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival from enrollment. Twenty-five patients were enrolled in this study, and the median age was 80 years. Fifteen (60.0%) and 10 patients (40.0%) had exon 21 L858R mutations and exon 19 deletions, respectively. The median progression-free survival from enrollment was 12.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 8.0-33.7 months]. The objective response rate was 88.0% [95% CI: 74.0%-99.0%], and the disease control rate was 100% [95% CI: 88.7%-100%]. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 12 patients (48.0%), and rash and nausea were the most common. Grade 3 or higher bevacizumab-related toxicities occurred in 4 (16.0%) patients, including proteinuria (n = 2), gastrointestinal perforation (n = 1) and pneumothorax (n = 1). A dose reduction of erlotinib and cessation of bevacizumab was required in 16 (64.0%) and 18 patients (72.0%), respectively. Erlotinib and bevacizumab combination therapy showed a minimal survival benefit with frequent dose reductions and/or treatment discontinuations in elderly patients with EGFR-positive NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.