ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2020
Reengineering Bone-Implant Interfaces for Improved Mechanotransduction and Clinical Outcomes.
Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Magnetron sputtering to enhance bone integration of tantalum-coated titanium implants: an in vitro and in vivo analysis.BMC biotechnology · 2025Article
- Tailoring Self-Assembled Peptide Hydrogels with Antimicrobial or Cell Adhesive Properties for Tissue Engineering.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
- Prolonged cultivation enhances the stimulatory activity of hiPSC mesenchymal progenitor-derived conditioned medium.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Article
- Early Predicting Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Based on Deep Learning Within One Day.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- Effects of Aging on Osteosynthesis at Bone-Implant Interfaces.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- Trends in mechanobiology guided tissue engineering and tools to study cell-substrate interactions: a brief review.Biomaterials research · 2023Review
- Geopolymer Materials for Bone Tissue Applications: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives.Polymers · 2023Review
- Article
- Prolonged Post-Polymerization Biocompatibility of Polymethylmethacrylate-Tri-n-Butylborane (PMMA-TBB) Bone Cement.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Biomechanical Features of Graphene-Augmented Inorganic Nanofibrous Scaffolds and Their Physical Interaction with Viruses.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Improving the Intercellular Uptake and Osteogenic Potency of Calcium Phosphate via Nanocomplexation with the RALA Peptide.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The number of patients undergoing joint replacement surgery has progressively increased worldwide due to world population ageing. In the Unites States, for example, the prevalence of hip and knee replacements has increased more than 6 and 10 times, respectively, since 1980. Despite advances in orthopaedic implant research, including the development of novel implantable biomaterials, failures are still observed due to inadequate biomechanical compliance at the bone-implant interface. This comprises static and dynamic mechanical mismatch between the bone and the implant surface. The importance and robustness of biomechanical cues for controlling osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) have been highlighted in recent studies. However, in the context of bone regenerative medicine, it remains elusive how mechanobiological signals controlling MSC osteogenic differentiation dynamics are modulated in their interaction with the bone and with implants. In this review, we highlight recent technological advances aiming to improve host bone-implant interactions based on the osteogenic and mechanoresponsive potential of MSC, in the context of joint replacement surgery. First, we discuss the extracellular and intracellular mechanical forces underlying proper receptivity and stimulation of physiological MSC differentiation and linked osteogenic activity. Second, we provide a critical overview on how this knowledge can be integrated towards the development of biomaterials for improved bone-implant interfaces. Third, we discuss cross-disciplinarily which contributes to the next generation design of novel pro-active orthopaedic implants and their implantation success. Graphical Abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32803697What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.