Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32803697›Full record

ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2020

Reengineering Bone-Implant Interfaces for Improved Mechanotransduction and Clinical Outcomes.

F Melo-Fonseca, G Miranda, Helena S Domingues, Inês Mendes Pinto, Michael Gasik, F S Silva

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

F Melo-FonsecaCenter for MicroElectroMechanical Systems (CMEMS-UMinho), University of Minho, Campus de Azurém, Guimarães, Portugal. franciscarmelofonseca@gmail.com.
G MirandaCenter for MicroElectroMechanical Systems (CMEMS-UMinho), University of Minho, Campus de Azurém, Guimarães, Portugal.
Helena S DominguesInternational Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory (INL), Braga, Portugal.
Inês Mendes PintoInternational Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory (INL), Braga, Portugal.
Michael GasikSchool of Chemical Engineering, Aalto University Foundation, Espoo, Finland.
F S SilvaCenter for MicroElectroMechanical Systems (CMEMS-UMinho), University of Minho, Campus de Azurém, Guimarães, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of patients undergoing joint replacement surgery has progressively increased worldwide due to world population ageing. In the Unites States, for example, the prevalence of hip and knee replacements has increased more than 6 and 10 times, respectively, since 1980. Despite advances in orthopaedic implant research, including the development of novel implantable biomaterials, failures are still observed due to inadequate biomechanical compliance at the bone-implant interface. This comprises static and dynamic mechanical mismatch between the bone and the implant surface. The importance and robustness of biomechanical cues for controlling osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) have been highlighted in recent studies. However, in the context of bone regenerative medicine, it remains elusive how mechanobiological signals controlling MSC osteogenic differentiation dynamics are modulated in their interaction with the bone and with implants. In this review, we highlight recent technological advances aiming to improve host bone-implant interactions based on the osteogenic and mechanoresponsive potential of MSC, in the context of joint replacement surgery. First, we discuss the extracellular and intracellular mechanical forces underlying proper receptivity and stimulation of physiological MSC differentiation and linked osteogenic activity. Second, we provide a critical overview on how this knowledge can be integrated towards the development of biomaterials for improved bone-implant interfaces. Third, we discuss cross-disciplinarily which contributes to the next generation design of novel pro-active orthopaedic implants and their implantation success. Graphical Abstract.

Indexed as

Mechanotransduction, CellularAnimalsArthroplastyBone-Implant InterfaceHumansOsteogenesisTissue EngineeringTreatment OutcomeBiomaterials surface designMechanobiologyMesenchymal stem cellsOrthopaedic implants failuresOsteogenic differentiation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.