Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32803696›Full record

ArticleStem cell reviews and reports2020

SIRT1

Paweł Golonka, Katarzyna Kornicka-Garbowska, Krzysztof Marycz

Open access · hybridAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Paweł GolonkaEquine Clinic Equivet, Gęsice 8, Domaniów, 55-216, Poland.
Katarzyna Kornicka-GarbowskaDepartment of Experimental Biology, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Norwida 27B Street, A7 building, Wroclaw, 50-375, Poland.
Krzysztof MaryczDepartment of Experimental Biology, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Norwida 27B Street, A7 building, Wroclaw, 50-375, Poland. krzysztofmarycz@interia.pl.
Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stem cell based therapy are now commonly applied in human and veterinary medical practice especially in orthopaedics. Mesenchymal stromal stem cells isolated from adipose tissue (ASC) are first choice option due to relatively non-invasive and safe procedure of tissue harvesting. However, ASC therapeutic potential strongly rely on patients general health condition, age and life-style. For that reason, to enhance therapeutic potential of cells, they are modified in vitro using different approaches. Previous studies have shown, that ASC treated with resveratrol, herein called SIRT+, are characterised by decreased senescence, increased proliferation rate and improved clinical outcome in autologous therapies. Herein, SIRT + cells in alginate hydrogel were applied to 5 years old warm breed mare was clinically evaluated due to the left hind lameness due to subchondral bone cyst. The therapeutic effect was assessed by the analysis of lameness score and radiological evaluation. This case report demonstrates the therapeutic potential of SIRT + cells in the treatment of orthopaedics disorders in horses as complete bone remodelling occurred after therapy and horse came back to training.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationAlginatesAnimalsArthroscopyBone CystsCell ProliferationCell ShapeFemurHorsesHydrogelsMesenchymal Stem CellsSirtuin 1Treatment OutcomeAlginatesHydrogelsSirtuin 1Adipose stem cellsHorseInjurySubchondral bone cyst

Identifiers

PMID32803696
PMCPMC7667135
OpenAlexW3049668869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.