ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2020
The impact of co-surgeons on complication rates and healthcare cost in patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction: analysis of 8680 patients.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Benefits and limitations of a dual faculty neurosurgeon approach to resection of pediatric craniopharyngioma.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024Article
- The Value of a Co-surgeon in Microvascular Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- Microsurgical training curriculum in a gynecological breast cancer center: a benefit for patients and surgeons?Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe use of two operating microsurgeons has been shown to improve the efficiency and reduce the operative duration of microsurgical breast reconstruction (MSBR). However, the impact of this practice on healthcare cost has not been previously assessed. The goal of this study is to query a national claims database to assess complication rates and overall cost in patients undergoing MSBR using co-surgeon (CS) vs. single-surgeon (SS) approach.
methodsThe study cohort, extracted from the MarketScan database, included all female patients who underwent MSBR between 2010 and 2017. Our primary outcome measure was the difference in total healthcare cost between the two operative groups while differences in complication rates were secondary outcome measures.
resultsWe identified a total of 8680 patients, out of whom 7531 (87%) underwent MSBR with a SS and 1149 (13%) had a CS. Over the study period, the annual incidence rate of MSBR cases using CS increased from 7.2% in 2010 to 23.3% in 2017 (p < 0.001). Following propensity score matching, complications, emergency room visits, readmissions, and reoperations were all similar between the CS and SS groups. The median total healthcare cost was higher for the CS group [US $76,227 (IQR $67,879) vs. $61,340 (IQR $54,318); p < 0.0001],
conclusionsUse of the CS approach in MSBR has become increasingly prevalent over time. Analyses of a national claims database suggested that the use of CS is a safe option for patients undergoing MSBR. Further research is needed to optimize CS utilization from a costs and outcomes perspective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.