Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32803637›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2020

Management of early breast cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil.

Francisco Pimentel Cavalcante, Guilherme Garcia Novita, Eduardo Camargo Millen, Felipe Pereira Zerwes, Vilmar Marques de Oliveira, Ana Luiza Lima Sousa, Ruffo Freitas Junior

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Breast Reconstruction during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2021
    Article
  11. Breast reconstruction and coronavirus pandemic.Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Breast cancer and COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil.Journal of surgical oncology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Francisco Pimentel CavalcanteFortaleza General Hospital (HGF), Rua Ávila Goularte, 900, Fortaleza, Ceará, 60150-160, Brazil. fpimentelcavalcante@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7156-2890
Guilherme Garcia NovitaGrupo Américas, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2983-3199
Eduardo Camargo MillenSão Vicente Clinic, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2113-6324
Felipe Pereira ZerwesPontificia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1643-727X
Vilmar Marques de OliveiraSanta Casa de São Paulo, School of Medical Sciences, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9478-5616
Ana Luiza Lima SousaFederal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7566-3541
Ruffo Freitas JuniorAdvanced Center for Diagnosis and Treatment for Breast Cancer (CORA), Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4145-8598
Universidade Federal de Goiás · BRFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo · BRFleury S.A. (Brazil) · BRHospital Geral de Fortaleza · BRHospital São Vicente · BRPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe COVID-19 pandemic has impacted early breast cancer (EBC) treatment worldwide. This study analyzed how Brazilian breast specialists are managing EBC.

methodsAn electronic survey was conducted with members of the Brazilian Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (SBM) between April 30 and May 11, 2020. Bivariate analysis was used to describe changes in how specialists managed EBC at the beginning and during the pandemic, according to breast cancer subtype and oncoplastic surgery.

resultsThe response rate was 34.4% (503/1462 specialists). Most of the respondents (324; 64.4%) lived in a state capital city, were board-certified as breast specialists (395; 78.5%) and either worked in an academic institute or one associated with breast cancer treatment (390; 77.5%). The best response rate was from the southeast of the country (240; 47.7%) followed by the northeast (128; 25.4%). At the beginning of the pandemic, 43% changed their management approach. As the outbreak progressed, this proportion increased to 69.8% (p < 0.001). The southeast of the country (p = 0.005) and the state capital cities (p < 0.001) were associated with changes at the beginning of the pandemic, while being female (p = 0.001) was associated with changes during the pandemic. For hormone receptor-positive tumors with the best prognosis (Ki-67 < 20%), 47.9% and 17.7% of specialists would recommend neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopausal and premenopausal women, respectively. For tumors with poorer prognosis (Ki-67 > 30%), 34% and 10.9% would recommend it for postmenopausal and premenopausal women, respectively. Menopausal status significantly affected whether the specialists changed their approach (p < 0.00001). For tumors ≥ 1.0 cm, 42.9% of respondents would recommend neoadjuvant systemic therapy for triple-negative tumors and 39.6% for HER2 + tumors. Overall, 63.4% would recommend immediate total breast reconstruction, while only 3.4% would recommend autologous reconstruction. In breast-conserving surgery, 75% would recommend partial breast reconstruction; however, 54.1% would contraindicate mammoplasty. Furthermore, 84.9% of respondents would not recommend prophylactic mastectomy in cases of BRCA mutation.

conclusionsImportant changes occurred in EBC treatment, particularly for hormone receptor-positive tumors, as the outbreak progressed in each region. Systematic monitoring could assure appropriate breast cancer treatment, mitigating the impact of the pandemic.

Indexed as

Coronavirus InfectionsMammaplastyMastectomyNeoadjuvant TherapyPandemicsPneumonia, ViralAdultAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBetacoronavirusBrazilBreast NeoplasmsCOVID-19Delivery of Health CareDisease ManagementErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneBreast surgeryCOVID-19Early breast cancerHormone receptor-positive tumors

Identifiers

PMID32803637
PMCPMC7429139
OpenAlexW3049495926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.