ReviewJournal of biological physics2020
Magnitude and significance of the peak of early embryonic mortality.
Review in Journal of biological physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exposure to Glyphosate and Chlorpyrifos Induces Oxidative Stress, Potentially Impacting Sex Determination in Zebrafish (Journal of xenobiotics · 2026Article
- Specific mitotic events drive left-right organizer development.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2025Article
- Transcriptomic profiling of three embryonic development stages in Rare Minnow (Gobiocypris rarus).Scientific data · 2025Article
- The onset of puberty in colony-housed male and female titi monkeys (Plecturocebus cupreus): Possible effects of oxytocin treatment during peri-adolescent development.Hormones and behavior · 2022Article
- Physical models of infant mortality: implications for defects in biological systems.Journal of biological physics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Embryonic development is of great importance because it determines congenital anomalies and influences their severity. However, little is known about the actual probabilities of success or failure and about the nature of early embryonic defects. Here, we propose that the analysis of embryonic mortality as a function of post-fertilization time provides a simple way to identify major defects. By reviewing the literature, we show that even small initial defects, e.g., spatial cellular asymmetries or irregularities in the timing of development, carry with them lethal effects in subsequent stages of embryogenesis. Although initially motivated by human study, in this contribution, we review the few embryonic mortality data available for farm animals and highlight zebrafish as a particularly suited organism for such a kind of study because embryogenesis can be followed from its very beginning and observed easily thanks to eggshell transparency. In line with the few other farm animals for which data are available, we provide empirical evidence that embryonic mortality in zebrafish has a prominent peak shortly after fertilization. Indeed, we show how subsequent mortality rates decay according to a power law, supporting the role of the early embryonic mortality peak as a screening process rapidly removing defective embryos.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.