ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2020
A cross-sectional exploratory survey on occurrence of triple-whammy prescription pattern in Japan.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Frequency and Profiles of Drug Combinations Constituting the Triple Whammy in Japan: An Analysis of a Patient Estimation Database.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Counselling customers at risk of the triple whammy effect at community pharmacies - A feasibility study.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The concurrent use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers, and diuretics, known as a "triple-whammy," is related to the occurrence of acute kidney injury. However, there are few reports regarding the prescription pattern of the triple-whammy. Objective To elucidate the patterns of the triple-whammy prescription in Japan. Methods A cross-sectional study was performed using a health-insurance-claims database that included Japanese people under 75 years of age, and enrolled outpatients that were prescribed any nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers, and diuretics between April 2017 and June 2017. As an outcome, the proportion of triple-whammy prescriptions was evaluated. Among the patients who received triple-whammy prescriptions, we evaluated the prevalence of chronic kidney disease and the proportion of prescriptions provided for these three drugs from different clinical departments and institutions. Results Overall, 730 of 246,721 (0.3%) patients received triple-whammy prescriptions. Among these patients, 13.3% had underlying chronic kidney disease. The proportions of any of the three drug types prescribed by different clinical departments and institutions was 48.2% and 61.8%, respectively. Conclusions We examined the patterns of triple-whammy prescriptions and concluded that pharmacists need to pay attention to triple-whammy prescriptions if the prescriptions are provided by multiple clinical departments or institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32803559What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.