ArticleJournal of medical systems2020
Strengthen Electronic Health Records System (EHR-S) Access-Control to Cope with GDPR Explicit Consent.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electronic health records in Brazil: Prospects and technological challenges.Frontiers in public health · 2022Pooled it
- Article
- The ethical challenges of personalized digital health.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Trust transfer in digital healthcare: The role of self-service systems in reducing patient treatment barriers.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient consent is currently a missing piece on Electronic Health Records System (EHR-S) access permission. The control is needed to ensure personal data as the property of the individual, not data controllers or health-care service providers. To cope with this need, in this article, an adaptation of existent Role-Based Access Control (RBAC), including patient-centric control, is described. The revisited feature of existing administrative and supporting RBAC functions allows exclusive control orchestrated by the patient as sole information owner, including the ability to encrypt their data for confidentiality purposes. The additions mimic a Discretionary Access Control (DAC) capability using existing user group membership to vet access over symmetric keys bind to patient's data via the associated PERMS matrix.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.