Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32803471›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2020

Use of Imaging to Optimise Prostate Cancer Tumour Volume Assessment for Focal Therapy Planning.

David Eldred-Evans, Henry Tam, Andrew P T Smith, Mathias Winkler, Hashim U Ahmed

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Three-dimensional spatial localization and volume estimation of prostate tumors usingEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David Eldred-EvansImperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK. d.eldred-evans@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6861-8160
Henry TamDepartment of Radiology, Charing Cross, Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust, Fulham Palace Road, London, W6 8RF, UK.
Andrew P T SmithNorth West London Pathology, Charing Cross Hospital/Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, W2 1NY, UK.
Mathias WinklerImperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Hashim U AhmedImperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 204998/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewRapid advances in imaging of the prostate have facilitated the development of focal therapy and provided a non-invasive method of estimating tumour volume. Focal therapy relies on an accurate estimate of tumour volume for patient selection and treatment planning so that the optimal energy dose can be delivered to the target area(s) of the prostate while minimising toxicity to surrounding structures. This review provides an overview of different imaging modalities which may be used to optimise tumour volume assessment and critically evaluates the published evidence for each modality. RECENT

findingsMulti-parametric MRI (mp-MRI) has become the standard tool for patient selection and guiding focal therapy treatment. The current evidence suggests that mp-MRI may underestimate tumour volume, although there is a large variability in results. There remain significant methodological challenges associated with pathological processing and accurate co-registration of histopathological data with mp-MRI. Advances in different ultrasound modalities are showing promise but there has been limited research into tumour volume estimation. The role of PSMA PET/CT is still evolving and further investigation is needed to establish if this is a viable technique for prostate tumour volumetric assessment. mp-MRI provides the necessary tumour volume information required for selecting patients and guiding focal therapy treatment. The potential for underestimation of tumour volume should be taken into account and an additional margin applied to ensure adequate treatment coverage. At present, there are no other viable image-based alternatives although advances in new technologies may refine volume estimations in the future.

Indexed as

Tumor BurdenHumansMaleMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm StagingPatient Care PlanningPatient SelectionPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstatic NeoplasmsFocal therapyMagnetic resonance imagingMulti-parametric MRIProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID32803471
PMCPMC7429546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.