Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32803441›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2021

A novel method for alveolar bone grafting assessment in cleft lip and palate patients: cone-beam computed tomography evaluation.

Marcin Stasiak, Anna Wojtaszek-Słomińska, Bogna Racka-Pilszak

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Updates in Cleft Care.Seminars in plastic surgery · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Regenerative Strategies in Cleft Palate: An Umbrella Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  13. Alveolar bone heights of maxillary central incisors in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients using cone-beam computed tomography evaluation.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2021
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marcin StasiakDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, Aleja Zwycięstwa 42c, 80-210, Gdańsk, Poland. marcinstasiak@gumed.edu.pl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5112-6322
Anna Wojtaszek-SłomińskaDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, Aleja Zwycięstwa 42c, 80-210, Gdańsk, Poland.
Bogna Racka-PilszakDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, Aleja Zwycięstwa 42c, 80-210, Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3709-3576
Gdańsk Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis retrospective cross-sectional study aimed to present a new method for secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG) assessment and to qualitatively evaluate the SABG results in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsResearch was conducted according to the STROBE guidelines. The study group consisted of 21 patients with a mean age of 16 years. High-resolution cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed at least 1 year after grafting. The experimental side was the cleft side, and the contralateral side without a congenital cleft was the control. Measurements were performed at four levels of the maxillary central incisors' roots according to the new scale with scores from 0 to 3. The sum of the scores provided a general assessment of bone architecture. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for intergroup comparisons, and a Kappa coefficient was used for reproducibility measurements.

resultsHigh individual variability was found, and the bone architecture was significantly worse on the cleft side than on the noncleft side. The results showed 28.57% failure, 33.33% poor, 19.05% moderate, and 19.05% good results from the surgical procedure. Kappa coefficients produced results from 0.92 to 1.00 for intra-rater and from 0.81 to 1.00 for inter-rater reproducibility.

conclusionsCBCT provides detailed information about alveolar bone morphology. The new assessment method is useful at every treatment stage and provides excellent repeatability. SABG did not provide good bone morphology, in most cases. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This research presents a new universal alternative for the assessment of SABG by utilizing CBCT.

Indexed as

Alveolar Bone GraftingCleft LipCleft PalateAdolescentCone-Beam Computed TomographyCross-Sectional StudiesHumansReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesAlveolar bone graftingCleft lipCleft palateCone-beam computed tomographyMaxillaOrthodonticsRetrospective studies

Identifiers

PMID32803441
PMCPMC7966225
OpenAlexW3049302136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.