Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32803378›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2020

Environmentally responsive QTL controlling surface wax load in switchgrass.

Jennifer Bragg, Pernell Tomasi, Li Zhang, Tina Williams, Delilah Wood, John T Lovell, Adam Healey, Jeremy Schmutz, Jason E Bonnette, Prisca Cheng and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comprehensive analysis of genomic loci associated with glaucousness in wheat (Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The genetic basis for panicle trait variation in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum).TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jennifer BraggWestern Regional Research Center, Crop Improvement and Genetics Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Albany, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5250-6925
Pernell TomasiArid-Land Agricultural Research Center, Plant Physiology and Genetics Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Maricopa, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9994-9782
Li ZhangDepartment of Integrative Biology, College of Natural Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8625-8042
Tina WilliamsWestern Regional Research Center, Crop Improvement and Genetics Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Albany, CA, USA.
Delilah WoodWestern Regional Research Center, Crop Improvement and Genetics Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Albany, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0894-6362
John T LovellHudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8938-1166
Adam HealeyHudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3088-6856
Jeremy SchmutzHudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8062-9172
Jason E BonnetteDepartment of Integrative Biology, College of Natural Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1835-8409
Prisca ChengWestern Regional Research Center, Crop Improvement and Genetics Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Albany, CA, USA.
Lisa ChanbusarakumWestern Regional Research Center, Crop Improvement and Genetics Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Albany, CA, USA.
Thomas JuengerDepartment of Integrative Biology, College of Natural Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9550-9288
Christian M TobiasWestern Regional Research Center, Crop Improvement and Genetics Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Albany, CA, USA. christian.tobias@usda.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7881-750X

Funding

Agricultural Research Service 2020-21410-007-00-DAgricultural Research Service 2030-21430-014-00-DNational Science Foundation IOS-0922457National Science Foundation IOS-1444533U.S. Department of Energy DE-AC02-05CH11231U.S. Department of Energy DE-SC0014156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageQuantitation of leaf surface wax on a population of switchgrass identified three significant QTL present across six environments that contribute to leaf glaucousness and wax composition and that show complex genetic × environmental (G × E) interactions. The C4 perennial grass Panicum virgatum (switchgrass) is a native species of the North American tallgrass prairie. This adaptable plant can be grown on marginal lands and is useful for soil and water conservation, biomass production, and as a forage. Two major switchgrass ecotypes, lowland and upland, differ in a range of desirable traits, and the responsible underlying loci can be localized efficiently in a pseudotestcross design. An outbred four-way cross (4WCR) mapping population of 750 F

Indexed as

Gene-Environment InteractionQuantitative Trait LociWaxesChromosome MappingCrosses, GeneticEcotypeGenetic LinkageGenotypePanicumPhenotypePlant LeavesTetraploidyWaxes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.