Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32803338›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2021

Off-label intrathecal use of gadobutrol: safety study and comparison of administration protocols.

Merete Halvorsen, Camilla Sæthre Edeklev, Jorunn Fraser-Green, Grethe Løvland, Svein Are Sirirud Vatnehol, Øivind Gjertsen, Bård Nedregaard, Ruth Sletteberg, Geir Ringstad, Per Kristian Eide

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Different Glymphatic Kinetics in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Neurosurgery and the glymphatic system.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Prospective Safety Study of Intrathecal Gadobutrol in Different Doses.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Merete HalvorsenDepartment. of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Postboks 4950 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Camilla Sæthre EdeklevDepartment. of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Postboks 4950 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Jorunn Fraser-GreenThe Interventional Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Grethe LøvlandThe Interventional Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Svein Are Sirirud VatneholThe Interventional Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Øivind GjertsenDept. of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Bård NedregaardDept. of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Ruth SlettebergDept. of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Geir RingstadDept. of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Per Kristian EideDepartment. of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Postboks 4950 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway. p.k.eide@medisin.uio.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6881-9280
Oslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents have been used off-label for diagnosis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks and lately also for assessment of the glymphatic system and meningeal lymphatic drainage. The purpose of this study was to further evaluate the short- and long-term safety profile of intrathecal MRI contrast agents.

methodsIn this prospective study, we compared the safety profile of different administration protocols of intrathecal gadobutrol (Gadovist

resultsAmong the 149 patients, no serious adverse events were seen in patients without history of prior adverse events. The combination of gadobutrol with iodixanol did not increase the occurrence of non-serious adverse events after days 1-3. Intrathecal gadobutrol in a dose of 0.25 mmol caused less severity of nausea, as compared with the dose of 0.5 mmol. The clinical diagnosis was the major determinant for occurrence of non-serious adverse events after intrathecal gadobutrol.

conclusionThis prospective study showed that intrathecal administration of gadobutrol in a dose of 0.5 mmol is safe. Non-serious adverse events were to a lesser degree affected by the administration protocols, though preliminary data are given that side effects of intrathecal gadobutrol are dose-dependent.

Indexed as

Off-Label UseOrganometallic CompoundsContrast MediaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingProspective StudiesContrast MediagadobutrolOrganometallic CompoundsContrast agentsGadobutrolGlymphatic functionIodixanolMagnetic resonance imagingSafety

Identifiers

PMID32803338
PMCPMC7803712
OpenAlexW3049111413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.