Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32803330›Full record

ReviewLangenbeck's archives of surgery2021

Innovative approaches for induction of gastrointestinal anastomotic healing: an update on experimental and clinical aspects.

Stefan Reischl, Dirk Wilhelm, Helmut Friess, Philipp-Alexander Neumann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Influence of the Microbiome on Anastomotic Leak.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Effects of adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells and/or sildenafil citrate in experimental colon anastomosis model.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stefan ReischlDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Dirk WilhelmDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Helmut FriessDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Philipp-Alexander NeumannDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. philipp-alexander.neumann@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7341-4296

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft NE 1834/2-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn most cases, traditional techniques to perform an anastomosis following gastrointestinal resections lead to successful healing. However, despite focused research in the field, in certain high-risk situations leakage rates remain almost unchanged. Here, additional techniques may help the surgeon to protect the anastomosis and prevent leakage. We give an overview of some of the latest developments on experimental and clinical techniques for induction of anastomotic healing.

methodsWe performed a review of the current literature on approaches to improve anastomotic healing.

resultsMany promising approaches with a high clinical potential are in the developmental pipeline. Highly experimental approaches like inhibition of matrix metalloproteinases, stem cell therapy, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, induction of the hypoxic adaptive response, and the administration of growth factors are still in the preclinical phase. Other more clinical developments aim to strengthen the anastomotic suture line mechanically while shielding it from the influence of the microbiome. Among them are gluing, seaming the staple line, attachment of laminar biomaterials, and temporary intraluminal tubes. In addition, individualized bowel preparation, selectively reducing certain detrimental microbial populations could become the next stage of bowel preparation. Compression anastomoses are evolving as an equivalent technique additional to established hand-sewn and stapled anastomoses. Fluorescence angiography and flexible endoscopy could complement intraoperative quality control additionally to the air leak tests. Virtual ileostomy is a concept to prepare the bowel for the easy formation of a stoma in case of leakage.

conclusionA variety of promising diagnostic and prophylactic measures that may support the surgeon in identifying high-risk anastomoses and support them according to their potential deficits is currently in development.

Indexed as

Anastomotic LeakSuture TechniquesAnastomosis, SurgicalHumansIleostomySuturesAnastomotic healingAnastomotic leakApproachIntestinal healingProphylaxisTreatment

Identifiers

PMID32803330
PMCPMC8208906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.