Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32803254›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2021

Invasive Group A Streptococcal Infections Among People Who Inject Drugs and People Experiencing Homelessness in the United States, 2010-2017.

Sandra J Valenciano, Jennifer Onukwube, Michael W Spiller, Ann Thomas, Kathryn Como-Sabetti, William Schaffner, Monica Farley, Susan Petit, James P Watt, Nancy Spina and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. A case report of fulminant primary purulent pericarditis due toEuropean heart journal. Case reports · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The rise and spread of invasiveMicrobial genomics · 2026
    Article
  14. Transcriptome of macrolide-resistantMicrobiology resource announcements · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Insights into MLSJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Sandra J ValencianoEpidemic Intelligence Service assigned to National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Division of Bacterial Diseases, Respiratory Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jennifer OnukwubeCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Division of Bacterial Diseases, Respiratory Diseases Branch, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Michael W SpillerCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Division of Bacterial Diseases, Respiratory Diseases Branch, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Ann ThomasOregon Health Authority, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Kathryn Como-SabettiMinnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
William SchaffnerVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Monica FarleyEmory University School of Medicine and the VA Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Susan PetitConnecticut Department of Public Health, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.
James P WattCalifornia Department of Public Health, Richmond, California, USA.
Nancy SpinaNew York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, USA.
Lee H HarrisonDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Nisha B AldenColorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Salina TorresNew Mexico Department of Health, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA.
Melissa L ArvayCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Division of Bacterial Diseases, Respiratory Diseases Branch, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Bernard BeallCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Division of Bacterial Diseases, Respiratory Diseases Branch, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Chris A Van BenedenCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Division of Bacterial Diseases, Respiratory Diseases Branch, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USAtlanta VA Medical Center · USCalifornia Department of Public Health · USColorado Department of Public Health and Environment · USConnecticut Department of Public Health · USJohns Hopkins University · USMinnesota Department of Health · USNew Mexico Department of Health · USNew York State Department of Health · USOregon Health Authority · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

CDC's Emerging Infections ProgramIntramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReported outbreaks of invasive group A Streptococcus (iGAS) infections among people who inject drugs (PWID) and people experiencing homelessness (PEH) have increased, concurrent with rising US iGAS rates. We describe epidemiology among iGAS patients with these risk factors.

methodsWe analyzed iGAS infections from population-based Active Bacterial Core surveillance (ABCs) at 10 US sites from 2010 to 2017. Cases were defined as GAS isolated from a normally sterile site or from a wound in patients with necrotizing fasciitis or streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. GAS isolates were emm typed. We categorized iGAS patients into four categories: injection drug use (IDU) only, homelessness only, both, and neither. We calculated annual change in prevalence of these risk factors using log binomial regression models. We estimated national iGAS infection rates among PWID and PEH.

resultsWe identified 12 386 iGAS cases; IDU, homelessness, or both were documented in ~13%. Skin infections and acute skin breakdown were common among iGAS patients with documented IDU or homelessness. Endocarditis was 10-fold more frequent among iGAS patients with documented IDU only versus those with neither risk factor. Average percentage yearly increase in prevalence of IDU and homelessness among iGAS patients was 17.5% and 20.0%, respectively. iGAS infection rates among people with documented IDU or homelessness were ~14-fold and 17- to 80-fold higher, respectively, than among people without those risks.

conclusionsIDU and homelessness likely contribute to increases in US incidence of iGAS infections. Improving management of skin breakdown and early recognition of skin infection could prevent iGAS infections in these patients.

Indexed as

Drug UsersFasciitis, NecrotizingIll-Housed PersonsStreptococcal InfectionsHumansStreptococcus pyogenesUnited Statesepidemiologygroup A Streptococcushomelessnessinjection drug usesurveillance

Identifiers

PMID32803254
PMCPMC8938854
OpenAlexW3036427275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.