Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32803153›Full record

ArticleClocks & sleep2020

Validation of an Automatic Arousal Detection Algorithm for Whole-Night Sleep EEG Recordings.

Daphne Chylinski, Franziska Rudzik, Dorothée Coppieters T Wallant, Martin Grignard, Nora Vandeleene, Maxime Van Egroo, Laurie Thiesse, Stig Solbach, Pierre Maquet, Christophe Phillips and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clocks & sleep, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of using AI-enabled technology in sleep medicine: a commentary.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Daphne ChylinskiGIGA-Cyclotron Research Centre-In Vivo Imaging, University of Liège, Allée du 6 Août 8 B30, B-4000 Sart-Tilman, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Franziska RudzikCentre for Chronobiology, Psychiatric Hospital of the University of Basel, Willhelm Klein-Strasse 27, 4002 Basel, Switzerland.
Dorothée Coppieters T WallantDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Liège, Allée de la Découverte 10 B28, B-4000 Sart-Tilman, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Martin GrignardGIGA-Cyclotron Research Centre-In Vivo Imaging, University of Liège, Allée du 6 Août 8 B30, B-4000 Sart-Tilman, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Nora VandeleeneGIGA-Cyclotron Research Centre-In Vivo Imaging, University of Liège, Allée du 6 Août 8 B30, B-4000 Sart-Tilman, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Maxime Van EgrooGIGA-Cyclotron Research Centre-In Vivo Imaging, University of Liège, Allée du 6 Août 8 B30, B-4000 Sart-Tilman, 4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3142-2623
Laurie ThiesseCentre for Chronobiology, Psychiatric Hospital of the University of Basel, Willhelm Klein-Strasse 27, 4002 Basel, Switzerland.
Stig SolbachCentre for Chronobiology, Psychiatric Hospital of the University of Basel, Willhelm Klein-Strasse 27, 4002 Basel, Switzerland.
Pierre MaquetGIGA-Cyclotron Research Centre-In Vivo Imaging, University of Liège, Allée du 6 Août 8 B30, B-4000 Sart-Tilman, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Christophe PhillipsGIGA-Cyclotron Research Centre-In Vivo Imaging, University of Liège, Allée du 6 Août 8 B30, B-4000 Sart-Tilman, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Gilles VandewalleGIGA-Cyclotron Research Centre-In Vivo Imaging, University of Liège, Allée du 6 Août 8 B30, B-4000 Sart-Tilman, 4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2483-2752
Christian CajochenCentre for Chronobiology, Psychiatric Hospital of the University of Basel, Willhelm Klein-Strasse 27, 4002 Basel, Switzerland.
Vincenzo MutoGIGA-Cyclotron Research Centre-In Vivo Imaging, University of Liège, Allée du 6 Août 8 B30, B-4000 Sart-Tilman, 4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5100-9927
University of Liège · BEUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation 147635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arousals during sleep are transient accelerations of the EEG signal, considered to reflect sleep perturbations associated with poorer sleep quality. They are typically detected by visual inspection, which is time consuming, subjective, and prevents good comparability across scorers, studies and research centres. We developed a fully automatic algorithm which aims at detecting artefact and arousal events in whole-night EEG recordings, based on time-frequency analysis with adapted thresholds derived from individual data. We ran an automated detection of arousals over 35 sleep EEG recordings in healthy young and older individuals and compared it against human visual detection from two research centres with the aim to evaluate the algorithm performance. Comparison across human scorers revealed a high variability in the number of detected arousals, which was always lower than the number detected automatically. Despite indexing more events, automatic detection showed high agreement with human detection as reflected by its correlation with human raters and very good Cohen's kappa values. Finally, the sex of participants and sleep stage did not influence performance, while age may impact automatic detection, depending on the human rater considered as gold standard. We propose our freely available algorithm as a reliable and time-sparing alternative to visual detection of arousals.

Indexed as

arousalsartefactsautomatic detectionelectroencephalographysleep

Identifiers

PMID32803153
PMCPMC7115937
OpenAlexW3043203133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.