Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32802867›Full record

Trial reportBioMed research international2020

Machine Learning Algorithms Identify Pathogen-Specific Biomarkers of Clinical and Metabolomic Characteristics in Septic Patients with Bacterial Infections.

Lingling Zheng, Fangqin Lin, Changxi Zhu, Guangjian Liu, Xiaohui Wu, Zhiyuan Wu, Jianbin Zheng, Huimin Xia, Yi Cai, Huiying Liang

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BioMed research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Early Prediction of Septic Shock in Emergency Department Using Serum Metabolites.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lingling ZhengGuangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Fangqin LinGuangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Changxi ZhuSchool of Software Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Guangjian LiuGuangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaohui WuGuangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhiyuan WuPediatric Intensive Care Units, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jianbin ZhengPediatric Intensive Care Units, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Huimin XiaDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yi CaiSchool of Software Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1767-789X
Huiying LiangGuangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9987-8002
Guangzhou Medical University · CNGuangzhou Women and Children Medical Center · CNSouth China University of Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is a high-mortality disease that is infected by bacteria, but pathogens in individual patients are difficult to diagnosis. Metabolomic changes triggered by microbial activity provide us with the possibility of accurately identifying infection. We adopted machine learning methods for training different classifiers with a clinical-metabolomic database from sepsis cases to identify the pathogen of sepsis. Records of clinical indicators and concentration of metabolites were obtained for each patient upon their arrival at the hospital. Machine learning algorithms were used in 100 patients with clear infection and corresponding 29 controls to select specific biosignatures to discriminate microorganism in septic patients. The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC value of clinical and metabolomic characteristics in predicting diagnostic outcomes were determined at admission. Our analyses demonstrate that the biosignatures selected by machine learning algorithms could have diagnostic value on the identification of infected patients and Gram-positive from Gram-negative; related AUC values were 0.94 ± 0.054 and 0.80 ± 0.085, respectively. Pathway and blood disease enrichment analyses of clinical and metabolomic biomarkers among infected patients showed that sepsis disease was accompanied by abnormal nitrogen metabolism, cell respiratory disorder, and renal or intestinal failure. The panel of selected clinical and metabolomic characteristics might be powerful biomarkers to discriminate patients with sepsis.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsMachine LearningSepsisAgedBiomarkersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID32802867
PMCPMC7403934
OpenAlexW3043958013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.