ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2020
The interstitial lung disease spectrum under a uniform diagnostic algorithm: a retrospective study of 1,945 individuals.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incidence and prevalence of interstitial lung diseases worldwide: a systematic literature review.BMJ open respiratory research · 2023Pooled it
- Article
- Article
- CaNO and eCO Might Be Potential Non-Invasive Biomarkers for Disease Severity and Exacerbations in Interstitial Lung Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Global epidemiology and burden of interstitial lung disease.The Lancet. Respiratory medicine · 2025Review
- The exosomal protein biomarkers auxiliary in diagnosis of interstitial lung disease.Respiratory research · 2025Article
- MFAP5 as a promising biomarker for connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Interstitial Lung Disease Epidemiology in the Past Three Decades: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Relative incidence of interstitial lung diseases in Brazil.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2024Article
- Enhancing Imagistic Interstitial Lung Disease Diagnosis by Using Complex Networks.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Anti-melanoma Differentiation-Associated Gene 5 (Anti-MDA5) Dermatomyositis: A Case Presentation.Cureus · 2022Article
- Analysis of Clinical Characteristics of Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease in 161 Patients: A Retrospective Study.International journal of general medicine · 2022Article
- Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy for connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease and interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features: a single center retrospective case series.Clinical rheumatology · 2021Article
- Variability in Global Prevalence of Interstitial Lung Disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReported data on the disease spectrum of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) of China are sparse and varied. We aimed to investigate the spectrum of ILDs and the distribution of diagnostic methods under a uniform diagnosis.
methodsThis retrospective study enrolled ILDs cases from Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health (GIRH). All cases were classified into specific subgroups of ILDs according to updated guidelines.
resultsA total of 1,945 subjects were enrolled from January 2012 to December 2017. The mean age was 57.9 years, and 1,080 (55.5%) patients were male. The most common subtype of ILDs was idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF, 20.3%), followed by interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF, 17.9%), connective tissue disease associated ILD (CTD-ILD, 18.3%) and unclassifiable idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (UIIP, 14.7%). A total of 818 (42.1%) patients underwent lung biopsy in order to obtain a histological diagnose. TBLB was performed in 565 (29.0%) patients, eleven of whom underwent SLB because TBLB failed to obtain lung samples. SLB was performed in 213 (11.0%) patients and TBCB was performed in 51 (2.6%) patients. Among them, histological results were considered clinically helpful in 722 (88.3%) cases, and provided definitive histopathological diagnoses in 368 cases. Surgical lung biopsy (SLB) was performed in 213 (10.9%) subjects, while 115 (54.0%) cases were performed among the idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP). Among SLB cases in IIP, the highest rate of SLB was desquamative interstitial pneumonia/respiratory bronchiolitis-interstitial lung disease (DIP/RB-ILD, 10/10), lymphoid interstitial pneumonia (LIP, 9/9), followed by cryptogenic organizing (COP, 18/26), nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP, 22/53), IPF (43/395), UIIP (13/285).
conclusionsIPF was the most common ILDs in our ILD center, followed by IPAF, CTD-ILD and UIIP. Histological information may help to establish diagnostic algorithm in ILD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.