Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32802439›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2020

The classification and treatment strategies of post-esophagectomy airway-gastric fistula.

Changchun Wang, Chengqiang Li, Xun Yang, Weimin Mao, Youhua Jiang, Jie Wu, Qiang Zhao, Anqi Ji, Qixun Chen, Hecheng Li and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Changchun WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China.
Chengqiang LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xun YangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China.
Weimin MaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China.
Youhua JiangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China.
Jie WuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China.
Qiang ZhaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China.
Anqi JiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Qixun ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China.
Hecheng LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jinshi LiuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNZhejiang Cancer Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAirway-gastric fistulas (AGFs) are rare but life-threatening complications after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Their effective and reasonable management is challenging and still controversial. This study reports the classification and management strategies of post-esophagectomy AGF based on a retrospective analysis of 26 cases in two large volume centers in China.

methodsBetween January 2000 and December 2017, 6,316 consecutive patients with esophageal carcinoma underwent esophagectomy. AGF was verified in 26 patients. The patients with AGF were divided into two types based on the anatomic characteristics of the fistula. Type I was characterized by the presence of fistula orifices in digestive tract that were higher than those in the airway and were treated with conservative management. Type II had both fistula orifices located on the same horizontal plane and were treated with surgical management. Pearson Chi-Square (R software) was used to compare mortality rates.

resultsFrom January 2000 and December 2017, 26 cases occurred AGF in 6,316 consecutive patients with esophageal carcinoma underwent esophagectomy and the incidence of AGF was 0.4%. Ten of 12 patients with type I AGF survived. Nine of 14 patients with type II AGF died. There was a significantly difference in the mortality rates between patients with AGF type I and II, which was 16.7% (2/12) and 64.3% (9/14) (χ

conclusionsAGF may be classified into two types according to the anatomic characteristics. Type I patients may be cured by conservative management and type II patients, require surgical intervention with pedicled tissues flap wrapping of the airway.

Indexed as

Airway-gastric fistula (AGF)classificationesophageal canceresophagectomymanagement strategy

Identifiers

PMID32802439
PMCPMC7399427
OpenAlexW3038856239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.