ArticleNursing open2020
Patients' perspective of attending nursing consultations-A pilot and feasibility study.
Article in Nursing open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of nursing consultations for people with systemic arterial hypertension in Primary Health Care.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2026Article
- [Exploring facilitators and barriers to implementing expanded nursing roles in MexicoEstudo de facilitadores e barreiras para a implementação de funções ampliadas de enfermagem no México].Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2023Article
- Patients' perspective of attending nursing consultations-A pilot and feasibility study.Nursing open · 2020Article
- A New Normality Illuminated by Past and Present! A Qualitative Study: Experiences and Challenges of Everyday Life in Patients With Advanced Heart or Lung Failure.Global qualitative nursing researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: The aims were to explore: (a) how patients with advanced heart and lung failure accept the overall framework of the nursing consultations and (b) the patients' acceptability and applicability of the nursing consultations. Design: Qualitative study. Methods: Interviews were conducted in an holistic frame and analysed using Graneheim and Lundman's qualitative content thematic analysis. Patients were interviewed between April and May 2018 regarding their general view of the nursing consultation and their experience of the framework inspired by R. R. Parse. Results: The overall theme was A confidential moment with the nurse to deal with and become more aware of what is important, based on following subthemes: "An option that makes sense," "Scheduled time with the nurse is important" and "To find a new normality in everyday life." The framework addressed a space of freedom requested by the informants, for whom attending nursing consultations was useful and meaningful, enabling them to reflect on everyday challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.