ArticleNursing open2020
Nurses' perspectives on technical skill requirements in primary and tertiary healthcare services.
Article in Nursing open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Supporting Novice Nurses' Transition to Independent Practice: Evaluation of the TIPS Program Using the Kirkpatrick Model.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
- Competency gap among graduating nursing students: what they have achieved and what is expected of them.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- The nurses' touch: An irreplaceable component of caring.Nursing open · 2023Review
- Observational
- Technical competency required by postgraduate psychiatric nursing students: A qualitative research.Journal of education and health promotion · 2022Article
- Supervising students in a complex nursing practice- a focus group study in Norway.BMC nursing · 2021Article
- Nursing supervisors' perspectives on student preparedness before clinical placements- a focus group study.PloS one · 2021Article
- Nurses' perspectives on technical skill requirements in primary and tertiary healthcare services.Nursing open · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To explore nurses' perspectives on technical skill requirements in primary and tertiary healthcare services and their perspectives on where students should learn these skills. Design: The study was conducted in Norway and had a cross-sectional, multicentre, descriptive design. Methods: We used a questionnaire to explore registered nurses and intellectual disability nurses' perspectives on technical skill requirements and learning ( Results: All the skills included in the university college curricula were reported to be required, and most skills should from the respondents' perspective be learned in the university college. There were significant differences between registered nurses and intellectual disability nurses about their perspectives on skill learning, but no significant differences between respondents in the interface between hospital and municipality wards. Conclusions: Results from this study indicate that nurses need extensive technical skills in both primary and tertiary health care. Findings also indicate a need to modify the university college curricula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.