SynthesisNursing open2020
Qualitative evaluation in nursing interventions-A review of the literature.
Synthesis in Nursing open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Qualitative evaluation in nursing interventions-A review of the literature.Nursing open · 2020Pooled it
- "Something is clashing" - intentions to offer Medication-Free services within a traditional mental health ward.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Article
- Therapeutic writing in a programme for binge eating disorder-A tool to come closer to clarifying feelings.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2022Article
- Australian residential aged care home staff experiences of implementing an intervention to improve palliative and end-of-life care for residents: A qualitative study.Health & social care in the community · 2022Article
- Improving patient-centred care through a tailored intervention addressing nursing clinical handover communication in its organizational and cultural context.Journal of advanced nursing · 2022Article
- An Implementation Process Evaluation Based on an Integrated Psychosocial Support Program of Colorectal Cancer Couples in China: A Pilot Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Patients' Experience of Attending a Binge Eating Group Program - Qualitative Evaluation of a Pilot Study.SAGE open nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To identify and synthesize qualitative evaluation methods used in nursing interventions. Design: A systematic qualitative review with a content analysis. Four databases were used: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase and CINAHL using pre-defined terms. The included papers were published from 2014-2018. Methods: We followed the guidelines of Dixon-Woods et al., Sandelowski and Barroso, the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme qualitative checklist and The Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research Approach. Results: Of 103 papers, 15 were eligible for inclusion. The main theme Conclusion: Different qualitative evaluation methods in nursing are a way of documenting knowledge that is difficult to illuminate in natural settings and make an important contribution when determining the pros and cons of an intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.