Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32802279›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2020

Method development for cross-study microbiome data mining: Challenges and opportunities.

Xiaoquan Su, Gongchao Jing, Yufeng Zhang, Shunyao Wu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Exercise and microbiome: From big data to therapy.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  6. Machine Learning Techniques for Antimicrobial Resistance Prediction ofComputational intelligence and neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Bioinformatics advances · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiaoquan SuCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong 266071 China.
Gongchao JingSingle-Cell Center, Qingdao Institute of BioEnergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, Shandong 266101 China.
Yufeng ZhangCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong 266071 China.
Shunyao WuCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong 266071 China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the past decade, tremendous amount of microbiome sequencing data has been generated to study on the dynamic associations between microbial profiles and environments. How to precisely and efficiently decipher large-scale of microbiome data and furtherly take advantages from it has become one of the most essential bottlenecks for microbiome research at present. In this mini-review, we focus on the three key steps of analyzing cross-study microbiome datasets, including microbiome profiling, data integrating and data mining. By introducing the current bioinformatics approaches and discussing their limitations, we prospect the opportunities in development of computational methods for the three steps, and propose the promising solutions to multi-omics data analysis for comprehensive understanding and rapid investigation of microbiome from different angles, which could potentially promote the data-driven research by providing a broader view of the "microbiome data space".

Indexed as

Amplicon sequencingData miningMicrobiomeMicrobiome searchMulti-omics dataShotgun metagenome

Identifiers

PMID32802279
PMCPMC7419250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.