Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32802150›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2020

A Comparative Analysis of Visual Encoding Models Based on Classification and Segmentation Task-Driven CNNs.

Ziya Yu, Chi Zhang, Linyuan Wang, Li Tong, Bin Yan

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ziya YuPLA Strategy Support Force Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5851-6534
Chi ZhangPLA Strategy Support Force Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4899-2745
Linyuan WangPLA Strategy Support Force Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1087-5911
Li TongPLA Strategy Support Force Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4197-7999
Bin YanPLA Strategy Support Force Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8268-559X
PLA Information Engineering University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, visual encoding models use convolution neural networks (CNNs) with outstanding performance in computer vision to simulate the process of human information processing. However, the prediction performances of encoding models will have differences based on different networks driven by different tasks. Here, the impact of network tasks on encoding models is studied. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data, the features of natural visual stimulation are extracted using a segmentation network (FCN32s) and a classification network (VGG16) with different visual tasks but similar network structure. Then, using three sets of features, i.e., segmentation, classification, and fused features, the regularized orthogonal matching pursuit (ROMP) method is used to establish the linear mapping from features to voxel responses. The analysis results indicate that encoding models based on networks performing different tasks can effectively but differently predict stimulus-induced responses measured by fMRI. The prediction accuracy of the encoding model based on VGG is found to be significantly better than that of the model based on FCN in most voxels but similar to that of fused features. The comparative analysis demonstrates that the CNN performing the classification task is more similar to human visual processing than that performing the segmentation task.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceDatabases, FactualFunctional NeuroimagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingPhotic StimulationVisual CortexVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID32802150
PMCPMC7416280
OpenAlexW3046394086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.