Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32802133›Full record

ReviewEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2020

Acupuncture for the Postcholecystectomy Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Zihan Yin, Qiwei Xiao, Guixing Xu, Ying Cheng, Han Yang, Jun Zhou, Yanan Fu, Jiao Chen, Ling Zhao, Fanrong Liang

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zihan YinSchool of Acu-Mox and Tuina, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Qiwei XiaoSchool of Acu-Mox and Tuina, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Guixing XuSchool of Acu-Mox and Tuina, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Ying ChengSchool of Acu-Mox and Tuina, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Han YangSchool of Acu-Mox and Tuina, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Jun ZhouSchool of Acu-Mox and Tuina, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Yanan FuSchool of Acu-Mox and Tuina, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Jiao ChenSchool of Acu-Mox and Tuina, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Ling ZhaoSchool of Acu-Mox and Tuina, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3955-0072
Fanrong LiangSchool of Acu-Mox and Tuina, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9689-5766
Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostcholecystectomy syndrome (PCS) has become a common postoperative syndrome that requires systematic and comprehensive therapy to achieve adequate clinical control. Acupuncture and related therapies have shown clinical effects for PCS in many studies. However, systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) for them are lacking.

objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture in the treatment of PCS using randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

methodsPotentially eligible studies were searched in the following electronic databases up to 1 February 2020: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science (WoS), Chinese databases (Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang Database (WF), and China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP)), and other sources (WHO ICTRP, ChiCTR, Clinical Trials, and Grey Literature Database). The RevMan 5.3 was employed for analyses. The Cochrane Collaboration' risk of bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias (ROB). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess the quality of the evidence.

resultsA total of 14 RCTs with 1593 participants were included in this SR. MA showed that acupuncture in combination with conventional medicine (CM) did not show statistical differences in reduction in pain. However, acupuncture in combination with CM significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55-0.92) and improved gastrointestinal function recovery compared to the CM group. Acupuncture combined with traditional Chinese medicine and CM, and acupuncture as monotherapy may improve gastrointestinal function recovery with acceptable adverse events.

conclusionAcupuncture may be an effective and safe treatment for PCS. However, this study lacks conclusive evidence due to poor quality evidence, limited data, and clinical heterogeneity of acupuncture methods in the included studies.

Identifiers

PMID32802133
PMCPMC7414376
OpenAlexW3045821964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.