ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2020
Evaluation of Routine Health Examination for Screening Primary Open Angle Glaucoma in Eastern China: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Agreement of Optic Nerve Head Evaluation of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Between General Ophthalmologists and Glaucoma Specialists.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the effect of routine health examination (RHE) for screening primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) in Eastern China. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe enrolled patients with newly diagnosed and untreated POAG admitted to the Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China. Patients who were screened on RHE and then diagnosed with POAG were classified into the RHE group. The rest were classified as the non-RHE group. Demographic and ocular characteristics, 24-hour intraocular pressure (IOP), and glaucoma grade classified as the mild, moderate and severe groups according to glaucomatous optic neuropathy evaluated based on the enhanced Glaucoma Staging System were compared between the two groups.
resultsIn total, 172 patients with POAG (74 cases in the RHE group and 98 cases in the non-RHE group) were enrolled. The average age of patients in the RHE and non-RHE groups was 47.53 ± 1.48 years and 51.47 ± 1.46 years, respectively (P = 0.064), while the average mean deviation (MD) was 5.98 ± 0.66 dB and 9.79 ± 0.80 dB (P = 0.001), respectively. The frequency of mild, moderate and severe grade glaucoma in the RHE group was 47.3%, 36.5%, and 16.2%, respectively, while that in the non-RHE group was 27.6%, 31.6%, and 40.8%, respectively (P = 0.001). The presumed visual field MD progression rate for Chinese patients with untreated POAG was 0.97 dB/year. Additionally, the 24-hour IOP curve in the two groups was similar, with the exception of the IOP at 10:00 PM and 2:00 AM, which was higher in the RHE group than that in the non-RHE group.
conclusionOur study showed RHE was an important and practical method to screen for POAG in Eastern China. RHE also assisted with an earlier diagnosis of POAG and may assist in preventing visual field loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.