Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32801922›Full record

ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry2020

Ultrasound Sonography to Detect Focal Osteoporotic Jawbone Marrow Defects Clinical Comparative Study with Corresponding Hounsfield Units and RANTES/CCL5 Expression.

Johann Lechner, Bernd Zimmermann, Marlene Schmidt, Volker von Baehr

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Johann LechnerDepartment of Clinical Research, Clinic Integrative Dentistry, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9800-0276
Bernd ZimmermannMedical Devices, QINNO, Wessling, Germany.
Marlene SchmidtDepartment of Statistics, STEYR Motorenwerke, Steyr, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6678-9652
Volker von BaehrDepartment of Immunology and Allergology, Institute for Medical Diagnostics Berlin, Germany.
CS Diagnostics · DEEngineering Software Steyr (Austria) · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe presently used impulse echo ultrasound examination is not suitable to provide relevant and reliable information about the jawbone, because ultrasound (US) almost completely reflects from the hard cortical jawbone. At the same time, "focal osteoporotic bone marrow defects" (BoneMarrowDefects = BMD) in jawbone are the subject of scientific presentations and discussions. PURPOSE: Can a newly developed trans-alveolar ultrasonic sonography (TAU-n) device locate and ascertain BMD? PATIENTS AND

methodsTAU-n consists of a two-part handpiece with an extraoral ultrasound transmitter and an intraoral ultrasound receiver. The TAU-n computer display shows the different jawbone densities with corresponding colour coding. The changes in jawbone density are also displayed numerically. The validation of TAU-n readings: A usual orthopantomogram (2D-OPG) on its own is not suitable for unequivocally determining jawbone density and has to be excluded from this validation. For validation, a 3D-digital volume tomogram@/cone beam computer tomogram (DVT@/CBCT) with the capacity to measure Hounsfield units (HU) and a TAU-n are used to determine the presence of preoperative BMD in 82 patient cases. Postoperatively, histology samples and multiplex analysis of RANTES@/CCL5 (R@/C) expression derived from surgically cleaned BMD areas are evaluated.

resultsIn all 82 bone samples, DVT-HU, TAU-n values and R/C expressions show the presence of BMD with chronic inflammatory character. However, five histology samples showed no evidence of BMD. All four evaluation criteria (DVT-HU, TAU-n, R/C, histology) confirm the presence of BMD in each of the 82 samples.

conclusionThe TAU-n method almost completely matches the diagnostic reliability of the other methods. The newly developed TAU-n scanner is a reliable and radiation-free option to detect BMD.

Indexed as

cavitational osteonecrosis of jawbonecone beam computed tomographyHounsfield unitsRANTES@/CCL5trans-alveolar ultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID32801922
PMCPMC7401665
OpenAlexW3030809094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.