Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32801898›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2020

Comparison of Docetaxel + Oxaliplatin + S-1 vs Oxalipatin + S-1 as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

Xin Zhang, Hejing Huang, Ziran Wei, Zhenxin Zhu, Dejun Yang, Hongbing Fu, Jiapeng Xu, Zunqi Hu, Yu Zhang, Qing You and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Xin Zhang *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Hejing Huang *Department of Ultrasound, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Ziran Wei *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Zhenxin ZhuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Dejun YangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Hongbing FuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Jiapeng XuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Zunqi HuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yu ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Qing YouDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Xin HuangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Ronglin YanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Weimin WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Qingping CaiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-8088-0463

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhat is the optimal neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) remains debatable. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of docetaxel+oxaliplatin+S-1 (DOS) vs oxaliplatin+S-1 (SOX) as NAC for LAGC.

methodsData of 248 LAGC patients who received either DOS or SOX as NAC in our hospital between January 2010 and January 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. Propensity score matched (PSM) analysis was applied to minimize the selection bias in both groups. Prognostic factors were screened by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses.

resultsOf the 248 LAGC patients included, 180 patients were subjected to the PSM analysis. Patients in DOS group showed a better tumor response to NAC, higher radical resection rate and R0 resection rate than those in SOX group. The overall survival (OS) rate in DOS group was better than that in SOX group, although the overall incidence of Grade 3/4 NAC-related toxicity in DOS group was higher, as represented by leukopenia and neutropenia. Multivariate analysis revealed that the NAC regimen, cTNM stage and the R0 resection rate were independent prognostic factors. In addition, patients with TLND less than 16 population showed a worse OS rate. Subgroup analysis indicated that patients benefited from the addition of docetaxel regardless of the clinical T stage, but those with high clinical N stages (N2-3) did not.

conclusionDOS is a safe and feasible NAC regimen for LAGC, which is worth popularizing in clinical practice.

Indexed as

docetaxellocally advanced gastric cancerneoadjuvant chemotherapypropensity score matched analysisradical gastrectomy

Identifiers

PMID32801898
PMCPMC7398747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.