Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32801846›Full record

ReviewJournal of pain research2020

Pain Scales in Neonates Receiving Mechanical Ventilation in Neonatal Intensive Care Units - Systematic Review.

Hanna Popowicz, Katarzyna Kwiecień-Jaguś, Jolanta Olszewska, Wioletta A Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pain research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06170957 (The Effect of Modified Teat on Pain, Physiological Variables, and Stress Level During Heel Blood Collection in Mechanically Ventilated Term Newborns), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06170957 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Modified Teat on Pain, Physiological Variables, and Stress Level During Heel Blood Collection in Mechanically Ventilated Term Newborns

TypeinterventionalSponsorHitit UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsPacifierArmsModified pacifier
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Evidence-based guideline for neonatal pain management in China (2023)].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2023
    Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hanna PopowiczDepartment of Obstetric and Gynaecological Nursing, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3152-2306
Katarzyna Kwiecień-JaguśDepartment of Anaesthesiology Nursing and Intensive Care, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8862-9871
Jolanta OlszewskaDepartment of Obstetric and Gynaecological Nursing, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Wioletta A Mędrzycka-DąbrowskaDepartment of Anaesthesiology Nursing and Intensive Care, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Gdańsk Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRecently, interest in the problem of proper prevention and monitoring of pain, especially acute, has been increasing in relation to various age groups. Greater awareness of the problem prompts discussion about the purpose of analgesia in newborns treated with mechanical ventilation.

aimThe purpose of the systematic review was to analyze current research on the use of pain scales in newborns treated with mechanical ventilation in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

methodsMedline databases: PubMed, OVID, EBSCO, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were traced using the appropriate keywords. The search was limited to studies in English. The review took into account the years 2006-2019. Considering the criteria, 12 articles were included in further analysis, to which full access was obtained.

resultsThe analyzed scientific research showed differences in beliefs about the validity and credibility of the scales used. Researchers indicated that staff with practical experience in using scales in their daily practice was very skeptical of the results obtained on their basis.

conclusionBased on this review, no explicit evidence can be obtained to support the use of one proper scale in pain assessment. It can be inferred that the COMFORT and N-PASS scales are effective for pain assessment and for determining the need for analgesics in mechanically ventilated neonates. These scales may be equally effective in assessing chronic pain, especially in mechanically ventilated children. On the other hand, the PIPP and CRIES scales are most commonly recommended for assessing acute and postoperative pain.

Indexed as

newbornNICUspainscales

Identifiers

PMID32801846
PMCPMC7399469
OpenAlexW3044992023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.