Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32801702›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2020

Mapping Intellectual Structure and Research Performance for the Nanoparticles in Pancreatic Cancer Field.

Xuan Zhu, Qingquan Kong, Xing Niu, Lijie Chen, Chunlin Ge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Global hotspots and emerging trends in 3D bioprinting research.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xuan ZhuDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110001, People's Republic of China.
Qingquan KongInstitute of Translational Medicine, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110122, People's Republic of China.
Xing NiuDepartment of Second Clinical College, Shengjing Hospital Affiliated to China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.
Lijie ChenDepartment of Second Clinical College, Shengjing Hospital Affiliated to China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.
Chunlin GeDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110001, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-6727-0596
China Medical University · CNFirst Hospital of China Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo comprehensively analyze the global scientific outputs of nanoparticles in pancreatic cancer research.

methodsPublications regarding the nanoparticles in pancreatic cancer research published from 1986 to 2019 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). Highly frequent keywords, publication years, journals, cited papers, cited journals and cited authors were identified using BICOMB software, and then a binary matrix and a co-word matrix were constructed. gCLUTO was used for double clustering of highly frequent journals. Co-citation analysis was performed using CiteSpace V software, including keywords, references, journals author or institution cooperation network.

resultsA total of 1171 publications were included in this study. Publications mainly came from 10 countries, led by the US (n=470) and China (n=349). Among the top 20 journals ranked by the number of citations, nanoscience nanotechnology was the leader with 300. Cluster analysis of citation network identified 12 co-citation clusters, headed by "stromal barrier" and "emerging inorganic nanomaterial".

conclusionOur findings reveal the research performance and intellectual structure of the nanoparticles in pancreatic cancer research, which may help researchers understand the research trends and hotspots in this field.

Indexed as

BibliometricsBiomedical ResearchChinaCluster AnalysisDrug Delivery SystemsHumansNanoparticlesNanotechnologyPancreatic NeoplasmsSerial PublicationsSoftwareUnited StatesCiteSpaceco-citation analysisco-word analysisnanoparticlespancreatic cancerWeb of Science

Identifiers

PMID32801702
PMCPMC7415461
OpenAlexW3047300873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.