Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32801673›Full record

ArticleClinical interventions in aging2020

The Frail'BESTest. An Adaptation of the "Balance Evaluation System Test" for Frail Older Adults. Description, Internal Consistency and Inter-Rater Reliability.

A Kubicki, M Brika, L Coquisart, G Basile, D Laroche, F Mourey

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04615533 (Validity Reliability of FrailBESTest in Older Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04615533 completednot on this map

Validity Reliability of FrailBESTest in Older Adults

TypeobservationalSponsorKırıkkale UniversityRan2020 to 2022Enrolled140ConditionsFrail Elderly Syndrome, Balance, Distorted, Assessment, SelfArmsFrail older adults, assessment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Frail'BESTest: an adaptation of the "balance evaluation system test" for frail older adults; Concurrent validity, responsiveness, validity for fall prediction and detection of slower walkers.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A KubickiINSERM UMR1093-CAPS, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, UFR Des Sciences Du Sport, Dijon F-21000, France.
M BrikaInstitut De Formation Des Métiers De La Santé, Hôpital Nord Franche-Comté, 2 Rue Du Docteur Flamand, Montbéliard 25200, France.
L CoquisartCentre Hospitalier Durécu-Lavoisier, Darnetal 76160, France.
G BasileCentre Hospitalier Durécu-Lavoisier, Darnetal 76160, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4305-010X
D LarocheINSERM UMR1093-CAPS, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, UFR Des Sciences Du Sport, Dijon F-21000, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1599-4258
F MoureyINSERM UMR1093-CAPS, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, UFR Des Sciences Du Sport, Dijon F-21000, France.
Inserm · FRL'Hôpital Nord Franche-Comté · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Balance Evaluation System Test (BESTest) and the Mini-BESTest were developed to assess the complementary systems that contribute to balance function. These tests include functional tasks involving several high-level exercises to assess the balance function, which may be even more difficult in case of frailty. The Frail'BESTest has been developed to make it possible to include frail older adults in systemic assessment. In this first paper, the objective is to present the Frail'BESTest and to describe the usefulness and complementarity of each system and to test the inter-rater reliability of the score measurements in two health centers.

methodsIn the first center, 192 frail and non-frail older patients were enrolled to test I) the contribution of each system, II) internal consistency, and III) the threshold and ceiling effects. The scores of 32 patients from center 1 and 32 patients recruited in another center (center 2) were used to measure the inter-rater reliability of the measurements by means of Kendall's tau coefficients.

resultsThe internal consistency was moderate to good for five systems and limited for "biomechanical constraints". The distribution of the Frail'BESTest was more centered than that of the Tinetti and Mini-Motor tests. The Kendall's tau showed strong concordance in center 1 for all systems and only for 4 on 6 systems in center 2. DISCUSSION: Completing a systemic evaluation, the therapist may prioritize the patient's needs identifying the most challenging systems. This paper presents the Frail'BESTest and confirms the psychometric properties at a first step level.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsActivities of Daily LivingAgedDisability EvaluationFemaleFrail ElderlyFrailtyHumansMalePhysical Therapy ModalitiesPostural BalancePsychometricsReproducibility of Resultsfrailtygeriatric assessmentmotor evaluationpsychometric propertiessystemic evaluation

Identifiers

PMID32801673
PMCPMC7398746
OpenAlexW3045983879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.