ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2020
Reconstruction of penile skin loss using a combined therapy of negative pressure wound therapy, dermal regeneration template, and split-thickness skin graft application.
Review in International journal of impotence research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Reconstruction of penile skin defect using negative pressure therapy, spiraling full-thickness skin grafts, and nanofat grafting: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluates the use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in conjunction with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and delayed split-thickness skin graft (STSG) application as an alternative to free tissue transfer for defect coverage of the penile shaft. Five patients with genital lymphedema and one with penile skin deficiency underwent penile shaft reconstruction with a two-stage surgical procedure. The first procedure aimed to the correction of skin defect and to neodermis regeneration through the use of an ADM (Integra®, Integra Lifesciences Corp., Plainsboro, NJ, USA) and NPWT. The second procedure 3 weeks later aimed to the covering of the skin defect with an unmeshed STSG. Both the Integra and skin graft showed completely taking at 7 days postop. No major complications occurred. At 6 months grafts gained sufficient elasticity to allow the sliding of the epidermis over the dermal layer, similarly the physiological penile shaft skin. Our results suggest that combined therapy might be an alternative to free tissue transfer for defect coverage of the penile shaft, leading to a good esthetic result, an optimal shaft coverage and providing adequate extensibility during erections. For best results we advise that in these cases urologists should collaborate with plastic surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.