ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2022
Ethical and Social Values for Paediatric Health Technology Assessment and Drug Policy.
Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic Review of the Relative Social Value of Child and Adult Health.PharmacoEconomics · 2024Pooled it
- The role of artificial intelligence in analysis of biofluid markers for diagnosis and management of glaucoma: A systematic review.European journal of ophthalmology · 2023Pooled it
- "From misdiagnosis to precision medicine: strengthening pediatric neuro-oncology care in LMICs toward equitable pLGG outcomes".Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- A scoping review of challenges in pediatric health technology assessments with a focus on pharmaceutical interventions.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2025Article
- "Blanket rules just don't work": Qualitative exploration of the relative value of child and adult quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gains for health technology assessment.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2025Article
- Suitability of paediatric legislation beyond the USA and Europe: a qualitative study on access to paediatric medicines.BMJ public health · 2024Article
- Population-based integrated care funding values and guiding principles: An empirical qualitative study.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Priority-setting for hospital funding of high-cost innovative drugs and therapeutics: A qualitative institutional case study.PloS one · 2024Article
- Precision oncology for children: A primer for paediatricians.Paediatrics & child health · 2023Article
- Translating Precision Health for Pediatrics: A Scoping Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Access to novel drugs and therapeutics for children and youth: Eliciting citizens' values to inform public funding decisions.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Article
- High-Cost Drug Policies in Canadian Children's Hospitals: An Exploratory Study.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2023Article
- Health technology assessment of paediatric medicines: European landscape, challenges and opportunities inside the conect4children project.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPublic policy approaches to funding paediatric medicines in advanced health systems remain understudied. In particular, the ethical and social values dimensions of health technology assessment (HTA) and drug coverage decisions for children have received almost no attention in research or policy.
methodsTo elicit and understand the social values that influence decision-making for public funding of paediatric drugs, we undertook a series of in-depth, semi-structured interviews with a stratified purposive sample (n = 22) of stakeholders involved with or affected by drug funding decisions for children at the provincial (Ontario) and national levels in Canada. Constructivist grounded theory methodology guided data collection and thematic analysis.
resultsOur study provides empirical evidence about the unique ethical and social values dimensions of HTA for children, and describes a novel social values typology for paediatric drug policy decision-making. Three principal categories of values emerged from stakeholder reflections on HTA and drug policy-making for children: procedural values, structural values, and sociocultural values. Key findings include the importance of attention to the procedural legitimacy of HTA for children, with emphasis on the inclusion of child health voices in processes of technology appraisal and policy uptake; a role for HTA institutions to consider the equity impacts of technologies, both in setting review priorities and in assessing the value of technologies for public coverage; and the potential benefits of a distinct national framework to guide drug policy for children.
conclusionCurrent approaches to HTA are not well designed for the realities of child health and illness, nor the societal priorities regarding children that our study identified. This research generates new knowledge to inform decision-making on paediatric drugs by HTA institutions and government payers in Canada and other publicly-funded health systems, through insights into the relevant social values for child drug funding decisions from varied stakeholder groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.