Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32801215›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

A robust and interpretable end-to-end deep learning model for cytometry data.

Zicheng Hu, Alice Tang, Jaiveer Singh, Sanchita Bhattacharya, Atul J Butte

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. CMV-specific clonal expansion of Th1, GZMKbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Interpretable deep learning in single-cell omics.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zicheng HuBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158 zicheng.hu@ucsf.edu atul.butte@ucsf.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4168-1725
Alice TangBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158.ORCID 0000-0003-4745-0714
Jaiveer SinghBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158.
Sanchita BhattacharyaBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158.
Atul J ButteBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158 zicheng.hu@ucsf.edu atul.butte@ucsf.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7433-2740
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201200028CNIH HHS HHSN316201200036W
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cytometry technologies are essential tools for immunology research, providing high-throughput measurements of the immune cells at the single-cell level. Existing approaches in interpreting and using cytometry measurements include manual or automated gating to identify cell subsets from the cytometry data, providing highly intuitive results but may lead to significant information loss, in that additional details in measured or correlated cell signals might be missed. In this study, we propose and test a deep convolutional neural network for analyzing cytometry data in an end-to-end fashion, allowing a direct association between raw cytometry data and the clinical outcome of interest. Using nine large cytometry by time-of-flight mass spectrometry or mass cytometry (CyTOF) studies from the open-access ImmPort database, we demonstrated that the deep convolutional neural network model can accurately diagnose the latent cytomegalovirus (CMV) in healthy individuals, even when using highly heterogeneous data from different studies. In addition, we developed a permutation-based method for interpreting the deep convolutional neural network model. We were able to identify a CD27- CD94+ CD8+ T cell population significantly associated with latent CMV infection, confirming the findings in previous studies. Finally, we provide a tutorial for creating, training, and interpreting the tailored deep learning model for cytometry data using Keras and TensorFlow (https://github.com/hzc363/DeepLearningCyTOF).

Indexed as

Deep LearningFlow CytometryCytomegalovirus InfectionsHumansT-LymphocytesCyTOFcytomegalovirusdeep learningflow cytometrymodel interpretation

Identifiers

PMID32801215
PMCPMC7474669
OpenAlexW3049397729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.