Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32801132›Full record

ReviewJournal of cell science2020

Science during lockdown - from virtual seminars to sustainable online communities.

Francesca Bottanelli, Bruno Cadot, Felix Campelo, Scott Curran, Patricia M Davidson, Gautam Dey, Ishier Raote, Anne Straube, Matthew P Swaffer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cell science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. RemoteForensicCSI: Enriching teaching, training and learning through networking and timely CPD.Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. We Need to Know: A Call for Interdisciplinary Education on COVID-19.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Cultivating Enduring Changes in Assessment Through a Life Sciences Community of Practice.Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Francesca BottanelliInstitute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Department of Biology, Chemistry and Pharmacy, Freie Universität Berlin, Thielallee 63, Berlin 14195, Germany.
Bruno CadotInstitut de Myologie, INSERM UMR974, Sorbonne Université, Paris 75013, France.
Felix CampeloICFO-Institut de Ciencies Fotoniques, The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona 08860, Spain.
Scott CurranThe Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Rd, London NW1 1AT, UK.
Patricia M DavidsonInstitut de Myologie, INSERM UMR974, Sorbonne Université, Paris 75013, France.
Gautam DeyMRC Lab for Molecular Cell Biology, UCL, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK g.dey@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1416-6223
Ishier RaoteCentre for Genonmic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Dr Aiguader 88, Barcelona 08003, Spain.
Anne StraubeCentre for Mechanochemical Cell Biology & Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Matthew P SwafferDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford CA 94305, USA.

Funding

Cancer Research UKMedical Research CouncilWellcome Trust FC001121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted traditional modes of scientific communication. In-person conferences and seminars have been cancelled and most scientists around the world have been confined to their homes. Although challenging, this situation has presented an opportunity to adopt new ways to communicate science and build scientific relationships within a digital environment, thereby reducing the environmental impact and increasing the inclusivity of scientific events. As a group of researchers who have recently created online seminar series for our respective research communities, we have come together to share our experiences and insights. Only a few weeks into this process, and often learning 'on the job', we have collectively encountered different problems and solutions. Here, we share our advice on formats and tools, security concerns, spreading the word to your community and creating a diverse, inclusive and collegial space online. We hope our experience will help others launch their own online initiatives, helping to shape the future of scientific communication as we move past the current crisis.

Indexed as

Congresses as TopicScienceVirtual RealityComputer SecurityCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansOnline Social NetworkingPandemicsPneumonia, ViralResearch

Identifiers

PMID32801132
PMCPMC7438008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.