Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32801113›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2020

Imprecise action selection in substance use disorder: Evidence for active learning impairments when solving the explore-exploit dilemma.

Ryan Smith, Philipp Schwartenbeck, Jennifer L Stewart, Rayus Kuplicki, Hamed Ekhtiari, Martin P Paulus, Tulsa 1000 Investigators

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06332963 (Interoceptive Mechanisms of Body Image Disturbance in Anorexia Nervosa), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06332963 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Interoceptive Mechanisms of Body Image Disturbance in Anorexia Nervosa

TypeinterventionalSponsorLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Inc.Ran2024 to 2028Enrolled102ConditionsAnorexia Nervosa, Body Image Disturbance, InteroceptionArmsFloatation-REST, IFT, EFT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Adherence Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Decision-Making in Repeated Games: Insights from Active Inference.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ryan SmithLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA. Electronic address: rsmith@laureateinstitute.org.
Philipp SchwartenbeckWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, WC1N 3BG, UK.
Jennifer L StewartLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Rayus KuplickiLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Hamed EkhtiariLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Martin P PaulusLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Tulsa 1000 Investigators

Funding

The Center for Neuroscience-based Mental Health Assessment and Prediction (NEUROMAP)P20GM121312 · NIGMS · LAUREATE INSTITUTE FOR BRAIN RESEARCH · PI Masaya Misaki · 2017 to 2026
$23.7M
Neural Basis of Meal Related Interoceptive Dysfunction in Anorexia NervosaK23MH112949 · NIMH · LAUREATE INSTITUTE FOR BRAIN RESEARCH · PI KHALSA, SAHIB · 2017 to 2021
$994k
Approach-Avoidance Conflict-a multi-level predictor for exposure therapy responseK23MH108707 · NIMH · LAUREATE INSTITUTE FOR BRAIN RESEARCH · PI AUPPERLE, ROBIN L · 2016 to 2020
$976k
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM121312NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH108707NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH112949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSubstance use disorders (SUDs) are a major public health risk. However, mechanisms accounting for continued patterns of poor choices in the face of negative life consequences remain poorly understood.

methodsWe use a computational (active inference) modeling approach, combined with multiple regression and hierarchical Bayesian group analyses, to examine how treatment-seeking individuals with one or more SUDs (alcohol, cannabis, sedatives, stimulants, hallucinogens, and/or opioids; N = 147) and healthy controls (HCs; N = 54) make choices to resolve uncertainty within a gambling task. A subset of SUDs (N = 49) and HCs (N = 51) propensity-matched on age, sex, and verbal IQ were also compared to replicate larger group findings.

resultsResults indicate that: (a) SUDs show poorer task performance than HCs (p = 0.03, Cohen's d = 0.33), with model estimates revealing less precise action selection mechanisms (p = 0.004, d = 0.43), a lower learning rate from losses (p = 0.02, d = 0.36), and a greater learning rate from gains (p = 0.04, d = 0.31); and (b) groups do not differ significantly in goal-directed information seeking.

conclusionsFindings suggest a pattern of inconsistent behavior in response to positive outcomes in SUDs combined with a tendency to attribute negative outcomes to chance. Specifically, individuals with SUDs fail to settle on a behavior strategy despite sufficient evidence of its success. These learning impairments could help account for difficulties in adjusting behavior and maintaining optimal decision-making during and after treatment.

Indexed as

AdultBayes TheoremFemaleGamblingHumansMaleProblem-Based LearningSubstance-Related DisordersTask Performance and AnalysisUncertaintyYoung AdultActive inferenceComputational modelingDirected explorationExplore-exploit dilemmaLearning rateSubstance use disorders

Identifiers

PMID32801113
PMCPMC7502502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.