ArticleJournal of global antimicrobial resistance2020
An audit of community-acquired pneumonia antimicrobial compliance using an intervention bundle in an Irish hospital.
Article in Journal of global antimicrobial resistance, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antimicrobial stewardship interventions in hospitalized adults with community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Antimicrobial stewardship in Ireland (2010-2021): a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Process evaluation of an effective Antimicrobial Stewardship intervention in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Article
- Impact of complex interventions on antibacterial therapy and etiological diagnostics in community-acquired pneumonia: a 12-month pre- and post-intervention study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Accordance of Registered Drug Packages with Guideline-Recommended Treatment Durations for Community-Acquired Pneumonia-A New Antibiotic Stewardship Target?Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Diagnosis and Therapy of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Observational Study and Medical Audit.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Empirical antibiotic treatment for community-acquired pneumonia and accuracy for Legionella pneumophila, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and Clamydophila pneumoniae: a descriptive cross-sectional study of adult patients in the emergency department.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Article
- A Service Evaluation of Adherence with Antimicrobial Guidelines in the Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia Before and During the SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak.SN comprehensive clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Antimicrobial prescribing and outcomes of community-acquired pneumonia in Australian hospitalized patients: a cross-sectional study.The Journal of international medical research · 2021Article
- Antibiotic prescribing patterns in patients hospitalized with COVID-19: lessons from the first wave.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesHospitalisations with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are often not managed in accordance with antimicrobial guidelines. This study aimed to assess whether guideline-driven antimicrobial prescribing for CAP can be improved using an intervention bundle. Secondary measures assessed were hospital length of stay (LOS), mortality, duration of intravenous antibiotics and total antibiotics, improved uptake of appropriate investigations, and documentation of CURB-65 score.
methodsA retrospective cohort of hospitalised CAP patients from August-September 2018 was compared with a post-intervention prospective cohort from May-June 2019. The intervention bundle included a mobile audience response system, promotion of the antimicrobial app, development of a physical card with local guidelines, and incorporating CURB-65 into the unscheduled admission proforma. Local guidelines are in keeping with British Thoracic Society CAP guidelines.
resultsA total of 69 adult patients (aged >18 years) were included in the study (37 retrospective, 32 prospective). Overall compliance with local CAP guidelines improved from 21.6% to 62.5% (P < 0.001). No difference in initial intravenous antibiotic duration was seen (median 4 days vs. 4 days; P = 0.70) and total antibiotic duration was significantly shorter in the post-intervention group (median 9 days vs. 7 days; P = 0.01). No difference in LOS or mortality was seen between the groups. Documentation of CURB-65 improved from 5.4% to 46.9% (P < 0.001). Uptake of streptococcal urinary antigen testing improved from 18.9% to 40.6% (P = 0.024).
conclusionsA simple, low-cost quality improvement bundle can significantly increase appropriate antimicrobial prescribing and shorten the total antibiotic duration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.